massive overstretch. well if you look at it from a german perspective then they are not very big invested yet their strategic investors if you look at the at the silk road they have a lot of money to spend there but they conned by the world they will need other countries to support the initiative and i think that s that s the main main challenge that it s not only about money and actually. we should not only look at the money that china spends we also spending a lot of money the west is spending a lot of money it s not like china invented building bridges and roads in developing countries maybe they invented that five thousand years ago but right now they re doing what the world bank and a lot of other developing agencies have been doing it s interesting because china in advance of medical visits to to beijing is has been complaining itself and asking how reliable is germany as
overstretch. well if you look at it from a german specked if. they re not very big invested yet their strategic investors if you look at the at the silk road they have a lot of money to spend there but they conned by the world they will need other countries to support the initiative and i think that s that s the main main challenge that it s not only about money and actually. we should not only look at the money that china spends we also spending a lot of money the west is spending a lot of money it s not like china invented building bridges and roads in developing countries maybe they invented that five thousand years ago but right now they re doing what the world bank and a lot of other developing agencies have been doing it s interesting because china in advance of medical visits to to beijing is it has been complaining itself and
we have focused on isis and i ll have shifted our focus, now we have targeted assad airbases, syrian regime airbases. two, you had to rex tillis and coming out today noting a coalition building support, this might be an overstretch but he did say it. potential change in leadership. if we have not heard that coming out of trump administration with regard to assad. three we ve seen the ad states now take a position that is contrary to the russians, the russians warning against u.s. action. three significant shifts in u.s. foreign policy happening over the course of the last hour with these 60 air strikes on targets in syria. shep: military leaders have warned us for years and decades and generations, you do not enter a military conflict without an understanding of the endgame appeared let s bring in general jack keane, former vice chief of staff, general david evening and thank you. what s your understanding of the goals and details of this
portfolios on foreign and domestic policy. you see bannon poor advertise peytoning in trade tax, foreign discussion, national security talks and also shaping what was happening on health care and much of what the congressional relationship is for the white house. the national security principals committee is a very important group within the white house, but it s almost a think tank for security policy. and if you look at past administrations, it s been an incubator for ideas that takes real attention, whether bannon could spend that much attention on that group remains a debatable question within the west wing. rosie, i think the whole thing with flynn seems an odd excuse, but i do think i don t find it unusual that bannon would be off the committee because he does seem overstretch. he doesn t seem a particularly good fit for this committee as well. it s not like he has a deep background in national security. i don t see anything sort of sinister or weird except for the reason o
the rest of the law survive? can peatses of it survive? that sing something they will ae in the morning and then in the afternoon, they argue about the medicaid expansion. under the law, millions will be forced to medicaid. and many say, it s an overstretch and second of all, we can t afford t. the federal government will subsidize a good part of that funding, up front. they start with 100% and fund the new people. but that does taper off and the states will have to make up some of the difference. they say they can t afford it and it should be money that is coming to them. but the feds say, if you don t go along with the new plan that puts millions more of individuals, possibly on to your roles, you lose all federal funding attached to medicaid, billions of dollars. the states say it s coercion and they can t afford it. greta: they are supposed to ignore what s going on outside the courthouse. and we will have more on that. but any reference at all to the protesters, on both sides of