silicon valley bank couldn t deal, basically, with rising interest rates? i basically, with rising interest rates? . , ~ . basically, with rising interest rates? ,, ., , ., rates? i really think that is no oversimplification rates? i really think that is no oversimplification of - rates? i really think that is no oversimplification of what - rates? i really think that is no - oversimplification of what happened here. i will actually tell you, it frustrates me to hear all the blimp in britain rising interest rates. the blame here should be on the fact that silicon valley bank probably wouldn t have passed distressed is because he diversify is enough, and they lobbied, back in 2017, 2018, to get this bank deregulation through that meant they wouldn t be subject to those kind of stress tests, they wouldn t be subject to the same kind of liquidity requirements and capital requirements. they got their deregulation, and guess what they got without deregulation? a greater risk that there wo
satirical commentary and social commentary, while chris still likes to hold on to the fantastical, so he can make these over-the-top joke that makes a big laugh. let s rewind a little bit, because last year you said it was wrong for will smith to hit chris rock, but you understand it. now that rock is speaking out in his own terms, do you still understand it? what do you think? yeah, absolutely. i think it s important that we still have oxygen for nuance. i know nuance doesn t do well in this country. i know we like black and white things. but to me, what transpired last year at the oscars is filled with gray. because there s a backstory here, there s a present conditioning happening. and there s also individual conversations that people are having with themselves that we re just not privy to. and i think oversimplification does more damage in terms of commentary and what happened last year than good. he used what happened in his life, he used will smith and
[applause] by the way, just a national divorce thing has been around for a while. it is more proof that an idea from the podcast world of has bubbled up into now the mainstream thing. what you make of it? i think it is oversimplification of politics, left right paradigm. it is more of a sphere. the core is the state and the closer you get to the core, the more you want the state in your life. for example on the right, they want more police. on the left, they want more social programs. so i don t think it is fair to call it the left right. but i would like to see is a populist divorce where people divorce from the identifying with the republican party or the democratic party and start identifying with each other as a people and i think as a result, what will happen is you will find that the republicans and democrats will have more bipartisan and put us first. i think it is a way to hold them accountable and make them do their job.
but a lot of my white house colleagues have been frustrated with the level of information that they are getting, specifically on the record in the right white house press conferences. it seems that there is not as much information being shared their. but we are finding more information just as time goes on, like finding about of out about these five additional documents. we will see if things progress and if the white house really sticks to its promise of transparency. julia ainsley, thank so much for your time. joining us now, elie mystal, justice correspondent for the nation. elie mystal, you are an outspoken critic if i understand, you have been a critic of garland appointing a special mystal council in the trump documents case. i don t know if it s an over gross oversimplification to summer as part of your theory here as, how many special counsels you have before it is no longer special? talk to me about your thinking here. the special counsel law says that the a. g. can ap
outspoken critic if i understand, you have been a critic of garland appointing a special mystal council in the trump documents case. i don t know if it s an over gross oversimplification to summer as part of your theory here as, how many special counsels you have before it is no longer special? talk to me about your thinking here. the special counsel law says that the a. g. can appoint a special counsel in extraordinary circumstances. could merrick garland please tell me what circumstance is not extraordinary according to his scared of his own shadow way of prosecuting cases? because what we have seen is that he is hiding behind the special counsel statute instead of simply doing his job. it is not difficult. it is not extraordinary to conduct an investigation about whether or not the president has classified documents, especially when the president is cooperating with the investigation. the idea that it is extraordinary simply does not pass the smell test. similarly, in the situat