the interviews have been made available why do you i think they should or shouldn t be handed over to congress. we know what merrick garland just explained there is a longstanding practice when congress aspirin information generally needs to be tied to a legitimate legislative use. what is the reason why congress wants this in this particular case or in prior cases? that aren t familiar with when you provide the transcript of some kind of interview that has been sufficient to satisfy the needs of the committee and so this is what merrick garland has provided as a transcript. for today. from my perspective, the committee has not provided a legitimate my reason why more should be provided in connection with their legitimate oversight responsibilities. as we know, president biden has asserted executive privilege and the department of justice has respected that on the basis that it could inhibit
Open letter to all Internal Audit Stakeholders
theheraldghana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from theheraldghana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Form 485APOS BlackRock ETF Trust
streetinsider.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from streetinsider.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
himself. it looks that way. jim jordan and i sent a letter to mr. wray right after his testimony. what happened was on july 12th he appeared before our judiciary committee because we have oversight responsibilities over the fbi, and he told us very clearly and emphatically there was only a single office involve in that infamous if memo that, as you said, rachel, targeted traditional cath will licks as catholic as potential violent especially treatmentists and domestic terrorists, it s unbheeivel, just because of our religious beliefs, right? he either per jr. injuredded himself because we know it involves multiple offices or he s lost control of the bureau, and i think either one of those scenarios are alarming, and i think director wray has a real problem, and i think congress has a real problem with him. the next question is what do you do about it. rachel: right. we re trying to hold him accountable, and i think he may be one of the cabinet officials who committed impeachable
republican presidential candidate, chris christie. crirace ray is a republican and served as your attorney, you recommended him. how did he do? i think he did well today. look, it is never a comfortable situation, i have appeared before congress as a member of the executive branch. it is never easy. it is always combative, and they are performing what they consider oversight responsibilities there is performance for cameras too. i was going to get to that. some are legit asking questions, i thought ken buck today was legitimately trying to get to the bottom of some things and did it in a way that was smart and respectful and got information back. some people are there just to perform. on both sides of the aisle. true. chris is a big boy and he understands this. let me say from my perspective, first off, this is a guy who has been nominated by two different republican presidents and twice confirmed by the united states senate, and not one republican in the united states senat