very inefficient oversight mechanisms and the worst part about it is if iran is unhappy with any of us do, they can back away from the deal. it prois all incentives to accept iranian malfeasance. it s the worst constructed deal? why didn t we demand changes? it seems we took too many things off the table? i am troubled by the deal. i m a supporter of president and his foreign policy but the conventional arms embargo, we stuck with it. i think it s bad ballistic missiles, conventional arms can go to syria, yen. i worry about israel. i want these hostages back. i think the washington post reporter, jason and who s insulted by trump, a marine there in iran, and the fbi
very inefficient oversight mechanisms and the worst part about it is if iran is unhappy with any of us do, they can back away from the deal. it prois all incentives to accept iranian malfeasance. it s the worst constructed deal? why didn t we demand changes? it seems we took too many things off the table? i am troubled by the deal. i m a supporter of president and his foreign policy but the conventional arms embargo, we stuck with it. i think it s bad ballistic missiles, conventional arms can go to syria, yemen. i worry about israel. i want these hostages back. i think the washington post reporter, jason and who s insulted by trump, a marine there in iran, and the fbi
get any conditionality against terrorism by proxies throughout the region by iran. danielle, you re an outspoken critic of the deal. yes. i think i m the only one at the table, actually. look, this is terrible in so many different ways. first of all, it front-loads all benefits to iran. we ve already said, it lets them continue supporting hezbollah, hamas, supporting assad s murder of, what, up to 300,000 people who have been killed in syria with iran s help, with hezbollah s help, the iranian revolutionary guard corps. it s got very ineffective inspection mechanisms very inefficient oversight mechanisms. and the worst part about it is if iran is unhappy with anything any of us do, they can back away from the deal. it provides all incentives to accept iranian malfeasance. it s the worst constructed deal? why didn t we demand changes? it seems we took too many things off the table early in the negotiation.
a river. you read and the governor ray tomlin says we re working on this, no leak of this magnitude should every happen again, but again, it s tough in a state where coal is so central to the economy to then be regulated. it s sort of intricately linked. the occupational safety and health administration for example which hadn t gotten out there for several decades really has had its budget slashed and is really suffering in its enforcement and compliance ability. the chemical safety board had also tried to investigate some very serious violations by other facilities in west virginia w. those recommendations that it had made for safety had been ignored and the chemical safety board has had its budget slashed severely. so our oversight mechanisms have
written by you to a degree. the government wants it both ways, virtually all the government s arguments to this court explain how the government acted in good faith to create a comprehensive meta data data base that serves as a valuable tool in combatting terrorism yet the government asks me to find the plaintiffs lack standing based on the theoretical possibility that the nsa has collected a union versus of meta data so incomplete that the program could not possibly serve its function. candor of this type defies common sense and does not exactly inspire confidence. so by the way, that s his exclamation point, not ours. this is a judge george w. bush appointed. were you surprised by this ruling? not at all. this is what happens when important legal issues are decided in open courts where both sides get to make legal arguments rather than in secret courts where the government alone gets to present arguments to a court. this is i think a good day for edward snowden. this is what he had