to the outside world, unperturbed. and instead of falling apart, he simply retreated to his childhood home. moved in with his parents. and so, clark paid twitchell dad and mom a visit. she struck me as a parent, her son does nothing wrong. where is the father, wanted to listen to me. he wanted to hear what i had to say. and he listened. but, he got overridden. they set up a says surveillance, to keep an eye on the house. and twitchell. but his behavior, was anything but suspicious. he went on about his business. took meeting with sweat investors about his project. even picked up a $35,000 check from financial backer, john vincent. the mark twitchell i was dealing with was articulate, in control. running his project the way that you would expect any entrepreneur to run the project. and detective clark world of apparels and down arrows. there was one huge up arrow in twitchell s favor. motive. or that is to say, the lack of one. there was no earthly reason for twitchell to kill a
which they can override certain regulations with bipartisan with votes in the house and the senate, but you ve got to get the the president to sign it. he s not going to sign that, so those will fail. but what other recourse is there for congress, or do we have to end up going to court? yeah. well, paul, those votes may well fail and not be able to be overridden, but i think they re stale worth taking because i think democrats should have to go on the record about whether they support some of these rules or not. barring that, i mean, the appropriations process is a powerful avenue for republicans to consider as they try to withhold funding. congress has the power of the purse, so that would be one avenue i would, consider. this is a great theme for any republican who s running for president right now. in addition to being a big drag on the economy and growth, this is not how the government is supposed to function. and so i think this is a good subject for republicans to take
of the states with the most bands. so why are you suing escambia county, specifically, as a strategy to challenge on a county by county basis. look, escambia county is emblematic of the pattern that we see across the country. with books being taken off shelves, in the case of escambia, at the cost of a single individual who has filled out forms up to 100 different books. it s quite clear, i don t think she s read the books. she s an information that is being provided by national organizations. the critiques of these books, objections to the books, are exactly what we see in other jurisdictions. and the school board has overridden, time and again, they opinions of its own review panel. a body that it has empowered to actually read the challenge to box. to make it considered evaluation, do these belong in school libraries and classrooms or not?
objections to the books, are exactly what we see in other jurisdictions. and the school board has overridden, time and again, they opinions of its own review panel. a body that it has empowered to actually read the challenge to books. to make it considered evaluation, do these belong in school libraries and classrooms or not? the panel has found value in these books, and yet the school board has swept their decision s aside. overridden it, and taken the books away. it s just a really egregious, almost eye-popping example of this national pattern. we are hoping that courts assessing this lawsuit will recognize that first and 14th amendment rights are being violated. and that school districts across the country will take notice. and put the books back on the shelf without having to be sued themselves. a member of the escambia school board told nbc news, that she was surprised by the lawsuit, because they were simply following state law that was set by the desantis administration. what