about why they wanted to stop those kind of maga attacks on trump democracy and the loss after the insurrection. but we have the receipts from those you see on your screen today, including senator graham, a loyal trump supporter then criticized what trump was leading on the insurrection on the night of january 6th. but now as he faces legal pressure to testify in georgia for his own role in helping a trump effort that he claimed was over when he gave his famous enough is enough speech after trump fans stormed the capitol, clambering to kill mike pence. i hope he runs again. if you think trump is bad for the party, i disagree with you. i think president trump is good for the party. [ cheers and applause ] all i can say is count me out. enough is enough. it is over. i ve travelled the world with joe. i hoped he lost. i d pray he would lose. he won. he s the legitimate president of the united states. some of this is pretty simple even though people would wish it otherwise.
counts we ll call it the not genius theory, and i think that definitely accounts for some of the conduct that s gotten people in trouble. but i think there s an overlapping theory here, and i m actually not joking about this although much of this is there was evidence they were writing each other before a violent insurrection occurred. so they thought secrecy and attorney/client privilege would hold, and i would observe often times it does if not for the horror on the 6th and then an assertive congressional committee. it s not clear any of this would be overturned to the new york times. what about in addition to saying obviously this is not true, and if we submit it to the government it s fraud, but we ll call it fake or alternate, winky face, and we don t think this