so don t say what you don t know. that s not what the leaks are. your network is full of leak information. you want to talk about leaks and talk about something you don t know, let s talk about the same point but what we do know. what we do know is this, i can prove it right now and you can prove nothing of what you ve said except to speculate. jordan and meadows both admit they ve gone to the white house after depositions to talk to white house counsel about the general contours of what s happening in the room. how is that okay? nothing wrong with that. how is that okay with a congress member with oversight responsibilities to talk to the subject being investigated about what they may have on him? the one on your show last night is talking about what s going on in that room all over washington and so are many other democrats who are spinning this. so there s nothing wrong with pushing back on false narratives. then why did nunes have to recuse himself? that s a differe
and some of the points may have valid notions to be clear. but they re arguing process instead of substance or policy because presumably they can t argue the latter? well i think that is pretty much right. i think if the roles were reversed and this was a democrat in the white house who had had these conversations with the president of another nation who had done these things and had run diplomacy in this way and brought in his personal attorney, republicans would be calling it treason and heads would be popping off and losing their minds all over washington so i think that they sort of find they re in a bind because they are so afraid of this president, they re so reliant on his support and in some ways and so afraid of the power that he wields on twitter that they can t bear to criticize him but they can t necessarily find a lot to defend in this and so they re attacking the process rather than the substance of what the witnesses who again many of whom are long time career official
this issue comes up. anyway, my thanks to marina hopes. a skype connection always tricky at the end. we ll be back tomorrow. the beat with ari melber starts right now. thank you very much. we have a lot in tonight s show. donald trump s erratic behavior raising the prospect of a tea party primary against trump. rudy giuliani admitting the state department is helping his push for a foreign government to the investigate trump s opponents, aka attempted collusion. a liberal economist shaping racial justice policy for 2020 demes is right on the beat. we begin with the alarm bells ringing all over washington, signs that donald trump is rattled and some republicans on edge. new york times reporting former trump officials worried about his behavior, rising pressure on trump clearly with the economy and his jitters over re-election. any jewish people that vote
con lution and it goes to theer this in washington. do we real that it goes to the ether in washington. is there an end? even if we find out if trump is not an agent of putin we won t be at the end to find out how it was we all fell for this. many people in the country fell for this. that needs further investigation and it should happen soon. bret: we re going to stay on it. we will have you covered here on fox news channel. panel, thank you very much. it s been quite two hours as special counsel robert mueller delivered his report to the attorney general who will now will make the decision what goes public, what goes to capitol hill. we have your covered on all sides. it s been a busy hour. thank you for covering and staying with us. for breaking news. special report will be back monday at 6:00 p.m. eastern time. we ve got you covered. fair, balanced, still unafraid. harris faulkner sitting in for my friend martha maccallum in new york with continuing
what do you take from that? well, i take from that we may still see indictments coming from the southern district of new york, washington, virginia. we may see in this report a road map for other and further investigations by u.s. attorneys offices and congress. what we see is there are no more for their indictments, unless there are skilled ones, from the special counsel itself. i think that s very significant, but that doesn t mean the president s problems are over. i do think if the report concludes there is no obstruction of justice, it will take the wind out of the attack on the president himself, though many of his colleagues are still now facing indictments, sending saying that, imprisonments. so i think we ll see some more in continuation of investigations, particularly by congress. but even that may come to an end because there will be court cases challenging the authority