they say? what s their response? they they say that there s no national security concern. they ve told us that they have properly vetted the fufu corporation and they see no problem with it, which just simply isn t true. well, just two months ago, we again sounded the alarm after the committee on foreign investment said it didn t have jurisdiction to block this mill s construction. let me put this very bluntly. the committee that congress mandated and gave the authority to protect america s national security is allowing a chinese business with ties to beijing. that means the ccp to operate mere miles from an american military installation. was general austin. how about meely? well, tonight, after months of pressure, the ap is reporting just hours ago that the u.s. air force has now told north dakota leaders that full fang s plans do pose a significant threat to national security, prompting city officials to say they ll move to stop the project once and for all. we re
committee, was dedicated to waste, fraud and abuse. bu e t think about this, laurer over the past two years, the democrats have not had a single hearing in sup the oversight committee, which ab fraud and abuse over pandemicd. fraud. not a single hearing. well, and i know the feds ares r now saying, okay, republicans, you ve got to look into this. ri but when i was reading thisth report ine the washington post , that was exactly what i thought. what h what have you beenav doing for the past two years? i meanpast t, they say that thirty six billion with small business programs thats was gone, 60 billion in potential fraud for unemployedfo insuranc. claims. i mean, this is just bueiburn seeing. on but i have to tell you, had a james clyburn on msnbc, he had a few thoughts on all i your investigations. but i think the here are ver very necessary. unnee really a waste of time. we saw that time and time again when they were in power beforeen and i think that will be the end result this