Discussed why as again as usual, the recallers are using very little fact in their attacks. Specifically, as we agree and about this incident involving force, we know that the choice, whether or not to file charges, was made not, made by suzie inaudible and this was an event that took place before mr. Rowdean was even in an office. As usual, theres very little basis for fact and these attacks and that is being used to malign mr. Rowdean and the job he is doing. Weve seen this superior judge weighed in on this and examined this evidence and recognized that if theres no bearing to the case whatsoever, until i view this as an attempt to get out of traditional oversight vital for our city to restore fate and the police. The police chief to reconsider his letter and allow outside oversight to this is to the surveillance stuff as well as this letter. In both cases, what weve seen is an unwillingness to accept outside methods of control and outside methods of feedback so, people are clearly s
Discussed why as again as usual, the recallers are using very little fact in their attacks. Specifically, as we agree and about this incident involving force, we know that the choice, whether or not to file charges, was made not, made by suzie inaudible and this was an event that took place before mr. Rowdean was even in an office. As usual, theres very little basis for fact and these attacks and that is being used to malign mr. Rowdean and the job he is doing. Weve seen this superior judge weighed in on this and examined this evidence and recognized that if theres no bearing to the case whatsoever, until i view this as an attempt to get out of traditional oversight vital for our city to restore fate and the police. The police chief to reconsider his letter and allow outside oversight to this is to the surveillance stuff as well as this letter. In both cases, what weve seen is an unwillingness to accept outside methods of control and outside methods of feedback so, people are clearly s
Discussed why as again as usual, the recallers are using very little fact in their attacks. Specifically, as we agree and about this incident involving force, we know that the choice, whether or not to file charges, was made not, made by suzie inaudible and this was an event that took place before mr. Rowdean was even in an office. As usual, theres very little basis for fact and these attacks and that is being used to malign mr. Rowdean and the job he is doing. Weve seen this superior judge weighed in on this and examined this evidence and recognized that if theres no bearing to the case whatsoever, until i view this as an attempt to get out of traditional oversight vital for our city to restore fate and the police. The police chief to reconsider his letter and allow outside oversight to this is to the surveillance stuff as well as this letter. In both cases, what weve seen is an unwillingness to accept outside methods of control and outside methods of feedback so, people are clearly s
Changes from 2016 and 2020. They went forward in the courts and prevailed, mostly, up to the fifth Circuit Court of appeals. They prevailed significantly so here, too, it is worth level setting so it is highly unusual and i think we can see how highly unusual it is like this Court Unanimously saying these individuals dont have standing. It is a case that deals with what we could call form shopping or judicial shopping. You can finish watching this online at cspan. Org. We leave this to take your life to the house financial subcommittee hearing on u. S. Cooperation with china and the role of the Export Import Bank. You are watching live coverage on cspan three. With that, lets go to the gentleman from texas, who is the Small Business Committee Chairman recognized for five minutes. Mr. Chair and madam chair, thank you for being here today. Compared to other export credit agencies and International Financial institutions, the bank intends to move forward more slowly when approving deals.
Initial 50. Has there been any tracking of whether or not parents add into it or other people add into fund beyond the 50 . Yes, families have saved 1. 7 million of their own money in the account and no city funding that. Is Family Savings and 50 of the Family Savings qualify for free and reduced lunch. Theyre very low income. Thank you very much. Thats a good sign. Thank you and to the department of the treasurer and Tax Collector this is a program that we lead in San Francisco and proud to have it. Thank you. Again no budget analyst. We will move to Public Comment. Anyone to comment on this item . Seeing this item its closed want motion to move it forward. So moved. Okay. We have a motion. Move without objection. If you could go to item two please. Item two is resolution approving the agreement with tegsco, llc dba San Francisco autoreturn and for Services Related to the towing, storage, and disposal of and abandoned and illegallyparked vehicles not to exceed 65,400,000 for the five