maybe blame his home life. new research in entirely false study, men with stay at home wives are likely to have negative opinion of women in the work place. men with traditional marriages who have women not employed, disfavor women in the work place and are more likely than average of all marriedry 9 men to make decisions that prevent advancement of qualified women. traditional family, that are archaic outmoded, this is more propaganda designed to attack that institution. my wife s dropped out of labor force to raise kids 20 years ago i respect my wife much more. this is garbage. do you have less respect for us not working? of course not. this i reject this notion. i know i m not even asked a question. i m ranting. i m good with your rant. i m really good with it. i never experienced this based
but there were a number of forces at work. look at rhode island. look where unions have been the strongest. look at the shuttered factories. i m not being anti-union here. i m pro-union. i want factories in connecticut, in rhode island, in massachusetts, across new england reopened. but the jobs from overseas, they re not going there. they re not going there because of work force rules that i think even trump told me were outdated and outmoded. is our education system outdated? no. our union advocacy, is that outdated, how they go about fighting for it? i don t know. that question was put on the table. whether factories are shut, that means jobs have left. if you look at wages enjoyed by workers in right-to-work states, i think it should be put on the table. where do they fare? i have not done the analysis so it s hard to say. it s a question, though, willie, whether you want the job
road, would you be willing to do something like that? look at medicare, what you re doing by moving it from 65 to 67 is again not reducing costs in medicare, it s not really reforming the medicare system you re just transferring those costs and risks onto people who may be 66 years old. martha: you are reforming the medicare system because it s going to go bust in several years, so if you prolong the program and make the age later, people are living longer, so isn t that age sort of outmoded and isn t that a good thing to address long term? there are a lot better ways of doing it. martha: that s a no i m hearing. you re not willing to change the age. no, because there are much better ways of dealing with medicare costs. let s look at ways we can reduce the cost ofe without transferring rising healthcare costs. we began to do that under the affordable healthcare act. there are other things you can accelerate to do exactly that. if you have two choices why not take the khoeuts tha
to get, at least a $50 refund. lbgt couples end up owing more than $2,000 filing separately. if this wrapped up in the federal deaf sigz of what family is, isn t it discriminatory? it really. it s really an outmoded, outdated, and discriminatory way of thinking about the family way. it stems from the federal government s refusal to recognize legal marriages in the six states and of columbia. it results in an economic instability for the kids, for the 2 million children. i want to show everybody that we have a family, just to put a face on this, that the ramifications goes beyond the numbers. this couple recently talked to the a.p. about the concerns they have because they don t want their daughter to face discrimination. yet she runs the risk, jennifer,
it set out the policy of containment. if we contain the soviet union, countering its influence, eventually the internal contradictions of the soviet system would trigger its collapse, and it worked. but porter and michaelby say the basic approach, a massive military to deter the soviets, a policy to counter soviet influence all over the world is still in place and outmoded and outdated. they call their policy proposal sustainment and they hope it just might be the policy that will carry us forward for the next 50 years. mr. y is hoping to be the next x, to set the new tone of washington strategy. will that happen? well, the term sustainment is silly, but the ideas behind it are not. washington needs to make sure that the united states does not fall into the imperial trap of every other superpower in history, spending greater and greater time and money and energy stabilizing disorderly