would have to prove that trump personally was involved in falsifying records. he would have to prove that trump understood these convoluted campaign finance laws that nobody understands and then intended to violate those very laws. and finally, he s got to getnd around the dual purposeende doctrine. the law says that if you have a secondary purpose, like a personal or commercial reason, for paying somebody money, then it s not a campaign contribution. tand that s been trump s argument all along. so this is a case that i doubt very much is going to getget pa passed a motion to dismiss. so, professor dershowitz, the democrats will say, oh, look at all the smoke here. dis they ve been saying that forl sa years and years and years. look at all the smokloe theroke must be something wrong with your take on it. there there are two systems of justice in the united states iny our justicsteme system is in dep