what do you think? i don t see it happening because nancy pelosi is not at the negotiating table. they are on vacation at the president invited people into the white house to have conversation of a bipartisan eating. by overplaying their hand. look, she had a win and push the president in the oval office. then she could have gotten dhaka but she s putting her own party in debt jeopardy. she is at the negotiating table in some way james, opened the government or don t deliver the state of the union but by the way, to be in the front row of your studio audience. thank you very much. the issue is this why she might not want a state of union speech. the vulnerability, the president starts negotiating publicly. he says, the issue of more high tech, haystack high-tech workers that they have been askg you to sell for many, many years, how about that in returnr the wall. he has been talking about this
floor a second ago. the state of the union address in jeopardy of the president potentially not going to deliver that address? i suppose it is. think about the ultimate irony, sandra. what nancy pelosi is saying, she will not take the financial steps to prevent illegal immigrants from flooding over the southern border. but she will potentially take the steps of having a barrier to donald trump walking into the well of the house of representatives. i don t think she has thought through how silly her position is. we have lawbreaking our southern border and most people despite the policies realized that is not a good way to run your immigration system. i m just old enough, sandra, to be a congressional staffer when bill clinton was president. there was a lot of republicans who said they would boycott president clinton state of the union address. i think the cooler s heads said it is disrespectful to the office of the presidency.
city councilman planning a defiant jester and kim jong un risen again. he wants the street with north korean mission to the united nations located to be renamed otto warmbier way. he represents everything we value in our freedoms. we want people to look up to see the street sign otto warmbier away and recall this was a life that was given up in the face of an absolute dictator and authoritarian government. he was on a trip and returned home with severe brain damage and a nonresponsive state. after he was imprisoned 17 months and turn down propaganda poster. the family says that he was beaten and tortured. fox news has observed the democratic were committing to the office and would have to pass otto warmbier way every day. this renaming will go a long way to remind people of the american values and how awful authoritarian dictatorship is. bill: the measure must pass
the government shutdown, we have federal workers and i don t think this is the time for the president to talk about and go and have unsolicited time going on and on and on about the shutdown and all that. but instead, she came up with this weak excuse. she hadn t checked with homeland. she didn t talk to secret service so some communication specialist in the office put this in a speech. here was a quote from the letter, she said sadly the security concerns and less government reopens this week and i suggest we work together to determine a suitable date the government reopen for this address or to consider delivering the state of the union address. in writing to the congress january. she is trolling hers, she is trolling him back and i think the argument should have been made about the appropriateness of the state of the young and with 8,000 workers. the speaker of the house is trolling the united states. and the president of the united states of america trolls the speaker of th
concern has been they would melt into insurgency and to really come back that you need boots on the ground. we also know when they have ungoverned space they will plot and plan against us. certainly not our fault syria is a failed state and we don t have the resources to fix that, but as long as this growing threat to the nation, that is the argument for having some skin in the game in syria. that way understand what the president is saying about wanting to remove the troops from harm s way. i would add to, however, a bit early to speculate the president s tweet being the cause of this attack. i wouldn t be comfortable making that judgment. bill: who is saying that? i think senator graham was insinuating the president s statement a month ago that we would withdraw the troops and bolded isis to launch an attack. that is a fair concern to raise, but i m not sure that we have the facts to back that up. it is certainly possible other facts we will learn as this