possible response should be brought in now ahead of time to try to prevent that analysis playing out. what do you make of that? ., ., ~ playing out. what do you make of that? ., ., ~ , playing out. what do you make of that? , , ., of that? so, look, this is a time for of that? so, look, this is a time for what of that? so, look, this is a time for what we - of that? so, look, this is a time for what we would i of that? so, look, this is a | time for what we would call active deterrence. i really believe that deterrence that is based on demonstrating capability and will, therefore the fact, is much more effective than deterrence based on the threat of punishment after the fact. so that means something on the scale of the berlin airlift, of more equipment, things like what the royal air forcejust equipment, things like what the royal air force just delivered, what the us just delivered and other allies, what the us just delivered and otherallies, doing what the us just delivered and
very high speak about that lead elements, a very highjoint task speak about that lead elements, a very high joint task force, but we speak very high joint task force, but we speak about more elements than just that one speak about more elements than just that one. second, we have allies, the united that one. second, we have allies, the united states, but also the united the united states, but also the united kingdom, otherallies the united states, but also the united kingdom, other allies that have increased readiness of forces that are have increased readiness of forces that are assigned to nato and the nato response force. so of course, these nato response force. so of course, these are nato response force. so of course, these are additional forces that we can deploy as part of the broader deployment of the nato response force deployment of the nato response force in deployment of the nato response force. i m not saying that we are deploying force. i m not saying