ht.fass thisnkudgesshouave iman beehl. paed por t thbegi ingisge ou thve beeget arhich pa p was tth gi gtobe h bt ch demoats asd be ot hoes o comoresss . siifictajohoties o theyad cosswhithous siic theyjoetaes faid to dot. ey it heus we ar s ey motahsaito ldoer d hee war s sti donohave l bu wet.tionve they caed tis pblem bu hinkhey t eya awawith t th pem gume tha repu icannk ay wath mehothwespo ible orme thha?puan a you arrigh hopo lethe thtereing ingis ou iar ghtheld e dareg g iout fo e ve yesda a wet uso to ve an ye apopri aionsill rweeveruso biof a spding ap thrie wonsd bel 12er bi apoprispionsngills theywowoulbe g2hrou apcommritee,nsomels ou ther ulwoulbe gou buet tt w mme,e pass.ouer we d n t ul a of at.bu t w th ss demrats idn dtt pa any af . th propatio lls.emtsn pany didn pas any udge opio s. w are vingn dn aasny ecomy,ge e wre ng wor s grtestcconoy, d govnmenis buetinor om wrk tosteek.no it ov makenbuin absutel wtok.o sen.ak sn: ibselhe srit hisen. new a o s i cilitythat s
the sle. oth ss he e e rpublansad the bill. t r webls oveto the ll hou. weve t thsena i mn.ou th sate thnaeve mr ce ba wi anumb. th se truve cba but the wimbenatdi put the ru hoe rpubl antheill at tuthe flooho rbll ey tboth faed. oo th s wh negthiatisfa.- thre swhat thhk thseg ti abt. thepub cans s haatthanyth abmber who ve thubnsa sinrelyy lieve erhowe veouldtfundinly pland ev parthoo ldnd i an disreear butoo i d t dbt theiiseincutity. beca de of dhepres entei don t ncppory. put ca ofg in th finabillest ey w tdot tooruthut in thhoverent naown.ll wo retathatt is the th biertn. at i one iue. taat is thhek th ibithe e i thne i i.izin thth iuzzeg arnd th i listing in theloor todzzar th s tne stre st g ingihe up.orod ththat t a date wee eught o gi hap. anoer day anat dee i rpectht heihaviewnoay ani digreeith rhemct buteiew i specthei vidis.eeh em shtinghe guternmt wn ov thaeceii
in, impression like that could be hard to break. what does the word doctor think? ask him. frank luntz, author of what americans really want really. i don t know if it backfired on the president. give him a break. he is the president. we want to hear what he has to say and we want to hear what the loyal opposition has to say. i think calling him arrogant doesn t apply. we did a focus group on hannity and split evenly between the mccain and obama voters a and th s s this and th surprised he wasn t as articulate when reading the teleprompter but they were shocked to find out republicans had an alternative point of view. they did appreciate the give-and-take and back-and-forth. what you can say about barack obama he wasn t as sharp as he normally is. arrogant? they didn t see that. neil: i may have seen it different. off the cuff and all, he was
donald trump and superego and just between the candidate himself and his advisors. seems that a die nam take th ss continue in the white house. he was the same person throughout his life and through the campaign. that person rather erratic. the question is does that really have any consequences or is it just for fun? right? if it s not your hand on the utten, who caut button, who cares if you re going off an twit jter? the question, does he want detente or a chance, a little goodwill from african-americans who might think again, donald trump might not think their perception is fair but they hon festally believe he was harsh on them. muslim-americans worried about him, latino americans worried about him. donald trump might think there is the wrong impression, not what i meant, not viewing in total context, but they do feel