Breaking bread and bolstering military ties. Vladimir putin makes a promise to his special guest, kim jongun. At the u. S. Warps Ns A Pay Is W pei a price. The battle is on but not all House Republicans want to fight it. When House Speaker Kevin Mccarthy is saying about the growing divide over his attempt to impeach. Plus, from crab walk to perp walk. An escaped murder captured in pennsylvania. Were following all of those stories and much more here on Cnn News Central. Today north korean dictator kim jongun pledged his full support for the ongoing invasion of ukraine. Comes as ukraine officials are sounding the alarm about an actively advancing arms deal between the two nations. Ahead of their summit putin gave kim a tour of russians far east. Russia said they would help develop their space and Satellite Program and while kim was there they launched two Ballistic Missiles off the eastern coast of the korean peninsula. It did not look like a coincidence. Cnns will ripley joins me from t
That. But what i wanted to ask, i wanted to ask you kind of the opposite argument that i hear a lot is that yes. Maybe its the democrats that are the racists because theyre constantly using the race card every year and trying to drum up hatred for white people with the black lives matter and all that stuff. But, and in addition to that, of course, the open borders which i constantly hear democrats and liberals like you say by 2050 whites will be a minority, isnt that great . And you get big applause. Its youre the racists. You want to displace the white population by 2050 if we continue these immigration policies. How is that not racism . You are the racists. [inaudible conversations] so, first, just one little piece of evidence. When you see marchers in charlottesville, some of them wearing white hoods and chanting racist and antisemitic slogans and the president says there are a lot of fine people there and says nothing after a bunch of people are murdered in a church in charleston,
Staff to get the senate doors closed, and other members can go on the staff . Someone . The subcommittee will come to order. When we recessed it was mr. Mckinleys turn to be recognized, so with that, i want to recognize the gentleman from West Virginia for five minutes. Thank you, mr. Chairman, and thank you, administrator, for coming and participating in this. Over the years, we had asked your predecessor [ inaudible ] mines up. Just come over here. Mines back up. Weve skdz asked your predecessors to come, particularly relating to section 321a. To see the impact some of the regulations were having in the coal fields, and they declined to do that. But i am particularly appreciative of the fact that a week ago or two weeks ago, the epa, you sent yourself, other folks came to West Virginia to get the impact of what these regulations are having, because its pretty clear in the statute that we have to abide by the economic impact, we have to take that into consideration when rules and regs
Mckinleys turn to be recognized. I want to recognize the gentleman from West Virginia for five minutes. Thank you, mr. Chairman. Thank you, administrator, for coming, participating in this. Over the years we had asked your predecessor no mike is up. Just come here. Now it is back. We had asked your predecessors to come particularly as relates to section 321a, to see the impact some of the regulations were having on in the coal fields and they declined to do that. But i am particularly appreciative of the fact that a week ago or two weeks ago the epa, you sent other folks to West Virginia to get the impact of what these regulations are having. Because it is pretty clear in the statute that we have to abide by the economic impact. We have to take that into consideration when rules and regs are promulgated. They didnt do that. I know you and i have had that conversation, that you want to follow the law very clearly, and i know a federal judge has already ruled that the epa in the past con
Predecessor no mike is up. Just come here. Now it is back. We had asked your predecessors to come particularly as relates to section 321a, to see the impact some of the regulations were having on in the coal fields and they declined to do that. But i am particularly appreciative of the fact that a week ago or two weeks ago the epa, you sent other folks to West Virginia to get the impact of what these regulations are having. Because it is pretty clear in the statute that we have to abide by the economic impact. We have to take that into consideration when rules and regs are promulgated. They didnt do that. I know you and i have had that conversation, that you want to follow the law very clearly, and i know a federal judge has already ruled that the epa in the past considered them discretionary and not mandatory. I think your position, i have heard from you, is you think they are mandatory and you intend to abide by them. Am i correct on that . Yes, congressman, and we did, in fact, as y