They had set certain types of businesses or types of businesses to be able to go through that expedite process. Currently massage is not in there. We are happy to continue that conversation, its not part of it right now. I think the larger picture with the Planning Department today in general is how is it that you are really better support the smaller businesses citywide across the industries. Thats something they have been looking at. They hired additional planners, like a dozen of them and they have programs for small types of businesses that maybe dont have to go through commissions. So im very interested in looking forward to that bigger conversation where again, massage would be included as part of that. The second issue is that you spoke about in terms of outreach in making sure people are aware of this proposal for conditional use process. This has been the process for many many years until 731 came into place. The other thing i want to highlight about it is that our Office Actu
Supportive of that. The question, the crux of this is the conditional use for certified legitimate practitioners. We have had a lot of discussion about that and there is a lot more discussion outside of this room with that and it sounds as though its intractable at this time that there is not going to be accommodation. We can object that here just go on the record to saying that we wish it would change, but again we are a recommending body. We dont do anything other than make a recommendation. If we want to make a recommendation we can go ahead and do that. Is there a commissioner that wants to propose a motion . And again, sort of with kind of an over arching and some specifics, i think it would be helpful to be on record to support supervisor tang because there was discussion at the Planning Department for the sole practitioner establishment to have it be just one but to support supervisor tang on the conditional use exemption for the sole practitioner with four and then also to supp
Wanted to see if increasing, im sure there is a lot of who, to do but increasing those allocations by 10 . You know how the capital plan shows the nexus between where our funding is being allocated and at what point we are going to meet the demands and the needs, is there any analysis on that . This is a very good question, thank you for asking it. I think the table that you have a question about is the one and im just making sure that im clear where it shows the need growing in year two and decreasing over years 35. I think what we tried to show and actually an earlier table historically what we found that departments have told us that they have a challenge thing time of projecting out it needs beyond the next year or two. So unlike capital where you can kind of see year over year, how deferred maintenance may you know build and eventually you wont need to replace a building, it systems and projecting out it is much more complex and departments have a much more challenging doing that.
Commissioner sarkissian . Yes, commissioner white . Yes. So we have 5 in favor aye and two nos. So that recommendation to the direction of the legislation is going in passes but then the commission is going to review the final draft at the april 27th meeting. Correct. With that, i think that concludes items no. 3 and 4. Yes, thank you all for committing the time you did and efforts before this meeting we received a number of very thorough letters detailing this issue and i appreciate that from the community and also appreciate the engagement of the Supervisors Office and the department of Public Health and so, it goes on from here. So thank you all. Commissioners we will move on to item no. 5 which is the directors report. So in your, i do not have a written report for you tonight. In your packet though i do want you to know that, in your packet, i dont have a copy of it myself but there is a calendar of events for Small Business week. Hang on just a moment. Maybe item no. 5 or 6. So v
Legislate because its a contractual agreement. Is that enough time to get all the permitting done . Just to submit the application. So there is no limit. This is my question, so how much time do they have to actually, they turn it in in 90 days but if it takes an entire year to get a cu, they are still able to operate senate 2ksh at that time . We hope it doesnt take a year, but our goal is to get people efficiently through this. Okay. Any other commissioner comments . I had just a question supervisor. You mentioned 200, you had an outreach to 200 establishments. So there are 250 in the city licensed establishments . Roughly at least in the data base they have. They could have been permitted through dph or filed an exemption because they were cmtc certified. Its a mix of the two. Obviously weve been communicating at the mail with the stakeholders. But we did try our best. If they want part of this discussion through a mailed letter to these businesses. How many licensed individual prac