wouldn t take long to wash yourself off. getting that cart, and head back to the house. and then at 9:02, the defendant over there who wouldn t even admit until forced to that he was even at the scene, all of a sudden he is as busy as he s ever been. 9:02 to 9:06, 283 steps. 9:03, we see the system start up on the car, that could mean he s close by the car, as he returned with maggie s phone and placed it in that car, and then, what do we see from 9:02 to 9:06, not on four-minute period, but he s su doing. what were you doing? and everybody though he has a photographic memory, he could not answer what he s doing during this four-minute period that is so illustrating of what we re talking about here. for four minutes he is not only going 283 steps. this is a defense exhibit, defense 156. 283 steps. and they put in the distance. we heard the distance isn t as accurate. it illustrates the point. that s 208 meters. meter, you know, roughly is a yard, a little bit more, a little b
hello. thanks for joining me. i m paula reed in for fredricka whitfield. we begin this hour with yet another hate crime targeting the jewish community as our nation faces an alarming rise in anti-semitic attacks. today a california man is facing up to life in prison after he allegedly targeted and shot two jewish men in separate incidents earlier this week. according to prosecutors, the first shooting wednesday morning as the victim walked to his car after leaving religious services at a synagogue in los angeles. the second incident happened the next morning just three blocks away. video shows the victim just moments after he was shot in the arm. police say both men were taken to local hospitals in stable condition. let s bring in cnn s camila bernal live in los angeles. what are authorities saying about the shootings? reporter: they re saying that they were targeted, specifically jewish men who were shot here in both cases. you mentioned two different shootings, but very,
one thing you will remember during this time period between 9:02 and 9:06 at 9:06, maggie s phone has an orientation change. her phone has moved from here to here. but what her phone doesn t have go to the second page. what her phone doesn t have are steps. the lieutenant testified that it doesn t look like anyone her phone is moving at 9:06 but there s no steps being registered. alex is walking from 9:02 to 9:06.
so what are the circumstances that the state relies upon? well, he was at the kennel at 8:44, paul last used his phone at 8:48. he replied to a text with a friend about a movie recommendation. maggie s phone locked for the last time at 8:50 and 8:49 and 50 some odd seconds, but 8:50, but however her phone recorded significant steps around 8:55, and we re going to see that, and her phone tried to activate the camera at 8:55, and it registered an orientation change at 9:06. i think pretty much understand orientation change, but when the phone goes from landscape to portrait or beats me, goes from that to that, that is an orientation change. and the phone will tell you. it did that at 9:06. and they got 300 shell casings,
in this case is that orientation change was at 9:06 that we just talked about. doug, if you will go defendant s 156, please. so these are alex s steps on his phone that registered during this time period. if you will go to entry if you look at entry 28, and if you will pull that out, doug. 28, this is between 9:02:18 and 9:06:47. this is the time period that mr. waters in his argument said was