Intelligence threats, cyber terrorism, and edward snowden. This is a little more than an hour. This is a list you do of accomplishments of a man and i have to recite them but i will go really fast. He was a white house fellow and he had the experience of working with the National Security council with such deadheads as Henry Kissinger whats the generals name . General brent snowcroft. He had three major positions in the senate including being the Administrative Assistant chief of staff, International Policy advisor to chris dodd. And a stint with robert byrd, one of the great characters of american politics. There are few companies he did not touch. Im sorry. He had such power that he moved their headquarters from texas to greenwich, which was quite amazing. He was assistant dean of the Fletcher School of law and policy and director of communications for the number one position or place in intelligence in the United States of america. Most recently as the Communications Director of the
You and knows not to ask questions so thank you. Out will make today about the Intelligence Community. Some threats and challenges. Id have to talk about the snowden controversy. I would like to talk about the way forward and invite some questions. Connecticut has produced its fair share of heroes. When i was in washington, i was invited to the cia to speak to groups and do orientations and explain what the Intelligence Community does. Outside of the headquarters is in an auditorium and that stands the statue of their patron saint from connecticut. After you give a speech like that, a connecticut guy outside, it is kind of moving. On the statue artist in his words i only regret that i have but one life to give for my country. Nathan hale means a lot to people because some of them do give their lives. Some names who you and i will never know have done that and he is an inspiration. Very interesting. He went from poverty and went down to new york city and he was discovered because he was
With the chief Information Officer. In other words, so overcome my event. It is still a good one for us to look at because its consistent with the recommendations and are thought at the time. And slide one, of the draft, you wrote ffm does not reasonably meet the cms security requirements, which are intended to minimize cms business risk, is that correct . During the security assessment that was conducted in september, the security testing was not able to be completed. They were able to test completely but these are your words of . Yes. Additionally you said theres also no confidence that personal identifiable information will be protected, correct . Again, during testing speed but these are your words. I drafted this initial memo. These are consistent with what you were saying in the september 25 from . This memo is catching the briefing we given the mr. Charest and mr. Baitman specs of the other two witnesses knew that these are your words, but paraphrase what you told them, theres a
This quaint look, orange jumpsuit, orange hair. Every channel was there and it was an hour of nothing happening. He did not say anything. So when you think about why do we do that, i know why we do it, because people tune in. So they are giving people what they want to see. But i think thats the worst part of it. As far as encouraging others to kill, there is an element, but it is a small one. The bigger part of the problem is the offensiveness, the negativity of that. You have, for example, an Academy Awardwinning actress for playing a florida serial killer. Or years before, mark harmon who at that time was the leading man of hollywood and he played bundy. What right do murderers have to have some famous actor or actress play them in the movie. I do not mind of movies about crimes as long as the killer is like a very small part of it and you dont have a star play the role. Goahead. My question is along the same lines. He said not to make those who are committing mass shootings, can yo
Sure, wolf. About an hour or so, theyre actually going to be on the floor, the plant floor, where ironically ten months ago it was the owners who announced to employees they were losing their jobs, that their jobs were going to mexico. That is where trump and pence will tour. Theyll make a speech to talk about some of the details of those incentives. Carrier said there were some state incentives involved in this deal. What we know so far from those involved in negotiations, it is 7 million over the course of ten years. Now, wolf, that is really nothing compared to what the Parent Company United Technologies said it was going to lose some 65 million or so overseas if each year if, in fact, they went to mexico. So lets take a look at the big picture here. United technologies is billions and billions of dollars in military contracting. 5. 6 billion to the pentagon. That could be part of the reason why of course they want to have a friendly relationship with the Trump Administration, to ke