The museum of literature, that is, in soviet times it was like that, they were in storage somewhere or somehow , after that, after the murder, we will talk about her death, but what happened to her works, when in 70 in the year she was killed, actually some works, they were already in the state collections, but there were not many of them, and after that her son oleksiy zaretsky, part of them. Works and and archives transferred to to museums, this the museum of literature, the sixties museum, and again i want to say that we will show many works from the collection of the actual family, these are works from the collection of olena zaretska, this is the granddaughter of zaretskaugorska, and she is actually also the cocurator of this exhibition, and now i we will talk more. About her life, and now i want to ask you about this story of hers with her terrible death, which happened in the 70s, i once talked about it with yevhen svirtsyuk, because it was he, he came to this place and he actua
About traitors who, following the call of their heart and conscience, went to serve the rashiv occupiers. Today there will be many new faces of treason, who are asking to be defamed throughout the country. But lets start with the wellknown seller, music producer yuriy bardash. After the fullscale invasion, he fled the country and first hid in georgia. There, on the pages of his social networks, he compared ukraine with nazi ukraine german, and he called himself russian. After. This bardash allegedly began to receive threats from the georgian legion, so the traitor decided to scratch while still safe in russia. I came here, roughly speaking, with a backpack. Yes, i have been to moscow before, but this time with the knowledge that i am here forever. In his telegram channel, a great expert and traitor, bardash writes that it was the zsu that blew up kakhovska and believes that the descendants. Russia will study how a great power, standing on its knees, ruled the history of the whole world
And people were provoked, a family comes to us, we say, look, we initially offered, vytrovych also offered in good to do this, and then it all went into the space of political speculation, because part of the parliament introduced a draft law for the bullpen, the bullpen, and the council voted, but the president did not sign it, and they are calling me to tell me in more detail, they are calling me from the president s office and they ask, but i am at the front, we. Are Still Standing under orichov on the zaporizhzhia road, i could pick up the phone, because we have a starlik, i pick up the phone, i cant speak now, we are leaving here on combat duty, the president is calling her , asks what is the problem with the bullpen, because part of it the law came, and some experts say that there are caveats, ask the National Memory institute, they will pass it on to me, i will tell you, well, here you are, i show you as many as five or six points that are risky, and they, well, the president sa
Scholz. For scholz, it is much more important what his generals discuss, one of them in a general position. They discuss disloyalty to the current chancellor. One of them says that scholz is a fool because he does not send taurus. And we need to create such a presentation. We must show that we want, we must taurus put this is a direct political disobedience of the military to the civilian leadership of the country. He just stated that if the taurus. Had been deployed earlier a year ago, then crimea would have already been subordinated to kyiv a year ago, so it is necessary to supply the taurus. Well, you know, its really hot in german, in the german media, in connection with this downpour, and they are really discussing the question of what is possible, well, why are we messing around with those tauruses for so long, they have to be installed, and thats it. All the more so because these soldiers really say, yes, they would help the ukrainians. And it would be very good, they would have
National producers to leave ukraine and create enterprises outside of ukraine, under other brands or under their own brands, but to move away from these national difficulties, which relatively speaking, well, significantly complicate the production of defense products, such trends, but among your enterprises there are those who want to go abroad and create an enterprise there. Unfortunately, such discussions exist, and i would like to emphasize now. For the state authorities on the fact that if we do not have a preference for the ukrainian manufacturer, if the orders are not predictable, if the export of surplus products is not opened, there is a great risk that a large number of enterprises, if they do not withdraw completely, will at least think about opening subsidiaries abroad, in ukraine, as a state, we do not need it at all, for this to happen, it is very important to preserve this defense industry. The complex that we built at such an incredible cost in ukraine, finally, and the