take your preconceived notions of the law and personal bis and put it on the shelf and go through the case biassed on the evidence and nothing else. it seems like what they are doing. one instruction, this case must not be decided for or against anyone because you feel 0 or angry with anyone. fell 0 or trayvon martin orang row at george zimmerman. i haven t sewn that in too many jury instructions. i don t know if this is such a emotionally fraught case. i think that language is unique. but there are general instructions and states differ, state poi state instructions differ. but the gist is the same. you cannot make a decision in a criminal case based on emotion. it has to be based on the evidence. what happens in the jury room?