country and down to crimea that russia held for eight years. what is putin s agenda? what would satisfy him, dana? is it the entire country? yesterday we were talking about the possibility of russian assets being set up coming in from the north, northeast and the east and the south. he has done all of that thus far. so does he want the entire country? and to take zelensky and throw his government out? that s option a. option b might be something where he is satisfied with a resolution that divides the country in half. you take portions east of this river as i describe here. best case scenario for the ukrainian people might be the disputed area they went into eight years ago. when you consider the line of attack that he has taken thus far, option c might be the best outcome. ukrainians are far out manned
process is not an inevitable thing, that we get to choose. i think america has a clear choice. itth can continue to reassessing itself geopolitically andca makg itself more dynamic economically. it can go down that route and prove that america still number one and will stayth number one. that is option a. option b, we can embrace a foreign policy in a domestic s policy that slows the economy down, weakens the united states as a great power and opened the door to a chinese century. that divides us domestically but weakens us internationally. as i said history is about choice, about c leadership but n a democracy it s about the individual citizen making the choice. we get to choose, in the next
has a very is clear choice. it can continue reasserting itselflf geopolitically, and making itself more dynamic economically had. it canic go down that root and t prove that america is still number and is going to stay number one that s option a. option b is that we can embrace a foreign policy and a domestic policy that shows the economy down, weakens the united states as a great part and opens the door to a chinese century. divides us domestically but also weakens us internationally as i ve said history is all about choice. it is about leadership but the democracy it is about the individual citizen making the choice. so question get to choose the america of next five or ten years i want to be optimist i m immigrant of two boy i want next ten, 50, 100 years to be great but i m keenly aware that it hang it is in the balance and it
there no such thing as features with the historical process is not fun inevitable thing. we get to choose. i think america has a clear choice. it can continue reassessing itself geopolitically and making itself more dynamic economically and go down that road and prove that america is still number one in the state number one. that s option a. option b is that we can embrace a foreign policy and domestic policy that slows the economy down, begins the united states as a great partner and opens the door to a tiny century. it could divide us domestically and we can thus internationally. as i said, history is about choice about leadership but in a democracy it s about the individual citizen making the choice we get to choose i want to be an optimist. i m an immigrant and a two little american boys and what
there no such thing as features with the historical process is not fun inevitable thing. we get to choose. i think america has a clear choice. it can continue reassessing itself geopolitically and making itself more dynamic economically and go down that road and prove that america is still number one in the state number one. that s option a. option b is that we can embrace a foreign policy and domestic policy that slows the economy down, begins the united states as a great partner and opens the door to a tiny century. it could divide us domestically and we can thus internationally. as i said, history is about choice about leadership but in a democracy it s about the individual citizen making the choice we get to choose i want to be an optimist. i m an immigrant and a two little american boys and what