a meeting like that? i think that this meeting i happening, not to be too cynical. please, as post-11 pm bring your cynicism. the purpose of this is to continue to emphasize what is very important political point for the democratic party a consistent point that they are pulling much better than republicans on, which is the issue of gun rights. excuse, me gun violenc prevention that is critical because the republican party is awfull extreme on this point. not just in the support, and the pervasive sale of assaul weapons, their opposition to universal background checks, but it is also an opportunit for the democratic party t rightfully stand on the side o public safety. so you see the president havin elected officials who now have national fame because they wan to continue to emphasize this. of course the other disastrous truth though, a modern-day politics and local level, is the only way in whic
in the role that you had i these first hundred days first, let me congratulat you on ten years of the highes ethical standard your bringing truth to power and the public congratulations, i was honored to be with you from the start. thank you for the opportunit with you today i am not want to speak personally about another leade but i will look at the results what you mentioned is that i has nothing to do with being wrong. as you know, in the ten year with all in, you had seen us move to expanding freedom on our country. we were very proud on the last term to have marriage equality
much, but fox, and their adult they know how to do this, if they would just tell our viewers the truth about what actually happened in the 202 election, that s what we r after. they still have the opportunit to do that, the positions we asked them why they won t do that, they said, it s old news now. which is ironic. but, it is what it is. i mean, not much indication that we re gonna suddenl change an editorial track on that one last night, said that fox gave a press statement in which he said foxes as mid to telling lies when does fox admit to telling lies i haven t heard them say that, and frankly as that. they conceded the judge ruling, which ruled that the were telling lies, and honestly, they also conceded that all th court filings that came out in january and february we put in evidence, your request for a mission, where they admitted to most of the lies and then when it came time for them to oppose our - we re not going to opposes
anticipated. quick follow-up on that i think there will be some shareholder losses this isn t a more nice amoun of money that comes from murdaugh s management. harry, there is a chance, think there is going to be shareholder lawsuits that migh have their own effect once tha ball starts rolling. 100%. that would ve already been the case all i m saying is, the opportunity cost of not having this evidence here for a potential apology, it was such a very, very rare opportunit that they had and it won t happen it s worth the $800 million for that, i think, probably. for fox, exactly. harry lippman, michelle goldberg, thank you both coming up, what this fox new settlement means for the informational bubble they have created and the right-wing politics they dominate particularly the republica primary that is largely a fo news primary david plouffe joins me right here, next don t go anywhere.
had, it already, i think, di have and you are right that nothing is going to penetrate the fo bubble there would ve been possibility in the way other large cases in american histor have done and maybe the januar 6th committee was aiming for this of establishing a socia fact in the broad middle not for all of a sudden fox to have the scales fall from thei eyes there are things that could ve happened, including a carefull crafted apology that will no now. it will just be a muddle and foxville go on with its weighs more easily than it would ve i it had been a blockbuster we anticipated. quick follow-up on that i think there will be some shareholder losses this isn t a more nice amoun of money that comes from murdaugh s management. harry, there is a chance, think there is going to be shareholder lawsuits that migh have their own effect once tha ball starts rolling. 100%. that would ve already been the case all i m saying is, the opportunity cost of not having this evidence here for a p