really need these medications. how badly do they depend on them? if somebody has been dependent on pain and taking them long term, at that pont they need them it would be hard to taper them down. that is one of the big concerns. it s worth pointing out we take 80 to 90% of the world s opioids in this country. my point is this, it s not that people don t need these medications the rest of the world physician out how to take less. people have pain issues all over the world. so why do we do they? different ways of treating pain, non-opioid based ways of treating pain. you have emergency rooms that are completely opioid free emergency rooms. in other countries. they figured outd out ways to
we have to know the truth. the republicans refuse to seek the truth by committee assignment, by establishing an outside independent commission and the president, of course, kowtows to putin rather than respecting the consensus of his own intelligence agency so we will seek the truth and where the truth takes us, we ll see. you ll seek the truth. will that require you to wait until special counsel bob mueller is done with his investigation? or if the democrats take back the house you will proceed accordingly? they are two different things. we can t possibly know what is happening in that investigation and that will be its own path but in terms of our ability as majority of the house to investigate the disruption of our own elections, that s a pont we have. we have a responsibility for oversight of the executive branch not to protect the
maybe. maybe the lesson of ferguson is f most of the police. that doesn t seem to be in response to some twitter troll. the same thing with a lot of oother justifying tweets. she retweeted the n word. it was someone using the n-word satirically to control race its and make the pont that they re wrong. the fact that she used her word has enough to be ousted before she got there i don t see how you fire quinn norton and stand behind jeong. the new york times i don t think has a defensible standard, clearly if she had used the n-worked she would have been fired. she can go open for years saying horrible thimgs about white people and that s okay. look, i m a big fan of the time s. i read it multiple times online
your damn brains out right now. at one point mary ann became so enraged, she even spat on him. you did this in the name of love? i didn t kill him. i did not kill him. and i don t know anybody who did. i hate you with all the passion i can dig up. mary ann s tirade certainly seemed authentic, but, of course, the cops weren t sure at least at this pont if she knew more than she was saying. did you ever think, mary ann has to have been involved in this somehow? i don t think she could have been directly involved, but she could have thrown out some ideas to him and he might have taken them on his own. but yanos guilt seemed clear enough. so kranke took his case to the d.a. and got a big surprise.
in the wake of his policy resulting in the some are saying enough is enough. are they, though? they broke with the party tweetsing this. it is fully the party of trump, and laura bush also spoke out in an op-et on for woss this zero-tolerance pont is true, and immoral, though he does not renounce her membership to the party. joining news evan sig free and evan mullen 2016 independent presidential candidate. and nicole is also back with us.