Says it should be banned. It is a device of torture. In the 21st century, if they were using torture, to Extra Ct 21st century, if they were using torture, to extract things, then they could use this. Watch the full story in just over ten minutes time, and werejoined by a group of women who say the implant has ruined their lives. Also on the programme, smashing the stigma on Mental Health, just how much good are william and harry doing by talking so frankly about Mental Health issues. And, north korea says its prepared to engage in all out war if the United States takes Military Action. Well look at what the secretive countrys next move could be. Hello. Welcome to the programme, were live until 11. Throughout the morning, the latest Breaking News and developing stories. And as always your own experiences are key to our conversations. If youve had a vaginal mesh implant get in touch and tell us your experience, has it worked for you . It has for millions of women, use the Hashtag Victor
Hysterical even more than usual, keep in mind this was a nonbinding, unenforceable agreement whose effect even if every nation involved follow the agreement to the letter cannot be in the position. In the world literally as they say. If Billionaire Democratic donor described trumps decision as assault and battery on the future of the american people. Cnn warned its viewers to expect mass extensions, flooding in the streets of new york city, the physical annihilation of the marshall islands. The aclu concluded leaving the agreement was a massive step back for Racial Justice and an assault on communities of color. There was cable news, the long faces, the grave, the florid and outraged proclamations. It was like somebody died, millions of them actually. On a sunny day in the rose garden, what could be defined and construed as a dark speech. This will be the the day that
believe. The irony is almost none of the religious figures you saw sermonizing On Tillage Vision to date know much abou
Chris Cuomo asks the tough questions to newsmakers in Washington and around the world. Rosenstein look, Jeff Sessions he recused himself. Had to have recused himself because theres a regulation in place that says if you work on a campaign and theres a criminal investigation relating to that campaign the president says it was a bum move and he should have told him about it and it was a total hoodwink. Wrong, wrong, wrong. As far as it being a hoodwink, sessions would have had to have had the gift of prophecy along with the president in order to believe at the time he was ainterest poed, there was was going to be to an investigation thats why i was confused by your initial writings on this one because of my respect for your mind and that rosenstein the only thing he could do is get a prophylactic in play, get somebody who had one layer away from the president , which technically a Special Counsel does, because otherwise he could have been fired like that if he were running it. The questi
The fact is that we dont need a direction from the president to the intelligence chiefs to be on guard against russian interference with our elections, number one. Number two, as far as what the president says on any given day, frankly he says a lot of things. He is, i think, campaigning against impeachment rather than saying anything that is designed to affect the outcome of the case. So i kind of brush that off. But to go back to your first point, that we dont need the president for the intelligence community. Thats a little counterintuitive. We expect the leadership from the president to be of paramount importance when were dealing with threats like this, which to the democracy is basically existential. So for him to not be on the same page seems to be highly counterproductive. Its counterproductive, but it is not at all necessarily critical. These intelligence agencies, particularly in an administration where statements
get made all the time, i think are pretty much doing their job
And say if you are in our country illegally, a single crime is too many. Talk about adding outrage to insults. Already breaking our laws, and then committing crimes. And there are an awful lot of crimes committed by people here illegally, and by noncitizens more broadly. The u. S. Sentencing Commission Says 44 of all federal inmates are noncitizens. Thats a huge number. Why wouldnt we be upset by that . Yeah, so, that federal data is only for federal prisoners, as you probably know. Tucker thats right. Federal prisoners account for fewer than 10 of all prisoners in the United States, and thats not representative of other crimes. Ill give you an example in 2016, almost 18,000 Homicide Convictions in the United States, but only 85 through the federal court because they simply dont prosecute homicide. So if you want to take a look nationwide at convictions and incarcerations of people by Immigration Status, thats a much better way to do it. Tucker well, you cant. No. It would be. Hold on,