he has a right to file public papers. he will definitely do that. he has no good arguments, though. and the courts are already very familiar with his strategy, as i mentioned, delay, delay, delay. so, i don t think they re gonna be able to do it. he s not gonna be able to do very much here. i expect six months to a year, maybe sooner, you can get them to expedite. can i ask about jury selection, because it s important because of the reaction we ve seen from supporters of trump yesterday, and again this morning, when they said, of course, it was a new york jury. of course, they were out to get trump. mark rubio, an attorney went to law school, said that jury is a joke, suggesting that we should ignore this because it is a new york jury. you had tommy tuberville, a senator from alabama this morning say this makes me want to vote for donald trump twice. and of course, it was a new york jury. can you talk a little bit about the jury, six men and three women. let me say two things, firs
so, her lawyer today - i follow the opening arguments just by reading a little bit o the transcript that came out just before we came on air and from following your live tweeting of the courtroom. walk us through what the opening argument is. the opening argument is e jean carroll experienced thi brutal assault at trump hands. she thought it was going to be a silly, frothy cocktail party story. she encounter some outside bergdorf goodman - after she comes off of work, h says, he ll come inside with m and help me pick out a gift fo a woman. she throws it back at him an says, you try it on. and the next thing that sh knows, she is walking into a dressing room, thinking that they are still playfully bantering, when he closes th door, slams are up against a wall, kisses her, pulls down her tights, and sexually assaults her and of course, she did not tal about this, which happened i the mid 1990s, until 2019, whe she wrote a book about the 2 most hideous manchin countered in her life.
he will to show you. and that is the advice that e. jean carroll took until motivated to share her story and come forward walk me through - we should say, we are expectin testimony from those women we are. are we expecting testimony fro both those women and we ar also expecting testimony fro e. jean carroll as early a tomorrow wow the trump lawyer, tacopina, who people have probably see on air here, what was his th nature of his opening argument said tha e. jean carroll made this up she made this up with lisa birnbach and carol martin. suing donald trump but he convinced there too and he recommended - objection, your honor sustained roberta kaplan, who is the attorney here. objection, your honor. sustained, the jury to disregard that out of order, but it s clear what they are trying to do here
it does not necessarily have t be that they believe h committed a rape that he touched e. jean carrol in an unwanted way - of course, she maintains tha he sexually assaulted her an that he penetrated her in that dressing room. her lawyer today had openin arm units today. so, her lawyer today - i follow the opening arguments just by reading a little bit o the transcript that came out just before we came on air and from following your live tweeting of the courtroom. walk us through what the opening argument is. the opening argument is e jean carroll experienced thi brutal assault at trump hands. she thought it was going to be a silly, frothy cocktail party story. she encounter some outside bergdorf goodman - after she comes off of work, h says, he ll come inside with m and help me pick out a gift fo a woman. she throws it back at him an says, you try it on. and the next thing that sh
walk me through - we should say, we are expectin testimony from those women we are. are we expecting testimony fro both those women and we ar also expecting testimony fro e. jean carroll as early a tomorrow wow the trump lawyer, tacopina, who people have probably see on air here, what was his th nature of his opening argument - he made e. jean carroll this up she made this up with lis burn bach and carol martin they are three people who ar motivated by three things. money, politics, and attention and you will see, according to joe tacopina, their story fall apart because of inconsistencies and among th three of them. we should say, this happene in 1996. so, we are already talking about something that happened long time. ago the statute of limitations on the actual assault itself would have expired but for a new york state law sort of reopen them for pursuit of civil justice, right correct this is interesting this is tacopina trying to bring george conway into