Thfauci arrested in july. In july, a fox news alert. Bidens Justice Department has just brought criminal charges against donald trump. His political opponent, for crii the third time in four months. This timenas agains, the chas relate to january 6th. Thisg. Evenin today, an indictment was unsealed charging donald j. Donl trump with conspirind g to defraud the United States, conspiring to Disenfranchize Voters and conspiring and attempting to obstruct anpig official proceedin ag. Issue the indictment was issued by a grand jury of citizens here in the distric a grandt of colu, and it sets forth the crimes charged in detail. That was special counsel jack smith, who looked like a bedraggled, nervous wreck dripping with anger and highly emotional. Dist the last time jack smith charged a politician, the case was so weak itand sets got toss of the Supreme Court unanimously. Biden is Justice Department is using obscure federal statutestician, to put a formet president in prison for the rest o
in itself and on what arguments can be made on behalf of a a client. cl this is outrageous. this is indefensible. ient, ageous, indefeand oh, by l occurring while joe biden, who has committed, in my opinion, worse acts than richard nixon, worse acts than bill clinton, by far worse acts than donal d trump is getting by on being the head of a family crime syndicate. it s outrageous as you laid out the timing. youait it s indefensible. and i don t think the american public is going to stand for it yeible andt. lara, if you look atu look the indictment here, it says a you re not allowed. you have to tell the truth. you re a politician and if a you don t tell the truth, if you re a politician, then you can probably go to jail and you can t throw a legal hailprobably mary because then you could go to jail, too. this thing lookail, andsng lo more frivolous the more you read. i mean, it s really incredibleksfrivolou. i expect then they ll be calling adam schiff very
it was dirty? that s right. the thing about a criminal level indictment and charges, you have to prove the intent, the mental state ofcoming the president at the time, which everybody that knows ntal trump and has read his truth know he still believes the stolen and heeves e has good cause to believe so. i also want to invitlee jack smith to look at the recent decision that we got yesterday, which dismissed t to wrismith trump from exact, defaming somebody by free speech and the first amendment for election interference and we won. so i m sorry, jack, you ve got to do your research a little clear before you write an indictment. you should have been up on that or you re going to have a tough we won.battlet a little. indi clay, i know you re a lawyer. i m definitely not. but so let me asld have up k ye it says in the indictment. so trump says the thing was crookear and it. d in arizona. right. and then some guy, some guy ata, the department of homeland security for cyber told guy at t,
your interpretation ofpap what happened today on the heels of what we heard yesterday about hunter and the big guy? oh, i think your assessment guy.hing s, jesse was right every day. it seems like following a major story that would be very damaging to the biden family. obviously, very conveniently and shockingly, there is an indictment oobviouslr somethingn the sort leveled against my father in law. but here s the truth about it all, jesse. you know that our entire family acted as surrogates out on the campaign trail. we ve always taken part in the campaigns of my father in law. i was actually, as you just pointed out, a senior adviser in 2020 to the trump campaign. and i ll tell you whaogates i multiple times a day would continue to receive reportn-s from across the country of people, sometimes in the form s detailing veryes i questionable, nefarious things. they sawn f affida at different polling locations. so we had a lot of questions about what happened in the 2020 election.
at its finest. motivat clay travis, how do e you think the trump votelectior the american voter, is going s? interpret thi well, i mean, the trump voter is going to rally around trump. jesse, because indisputably, this is an outrageous politicization of our justice department, the likes of which, frankly, i ve never seen in my entire life. and i want to focus on one aspect. i want to be the tru a lawyer here for justi a moment and use my fancy law degree. jesse.. what i can t get past is the y are trying to criminalize a legal theory in this indictment, . mean and let me explain exactly what i mean. when you look, i was doing research on this in december of 2022, they went and they changed the law as it pertains to the electoral count act. it was an 1887 law that was amended. there were legal advisers to donald trump who said thewery that mike pence had the ability to impact the way that we were receiving these electoral votes.