Six months after Michael Brown was shot and killed, this is what is left after the city erupted to protests. How would you describe life in ferguson today . Its sad, very depressing. Ou important is the upcoming election for ferguson. They cant help you in d. C. They have to help you in the local citial. Good evening, im joie chen. Its taken six months for ferguson, missouri to transition from a little known community in st. Louis to a hot bed of question. A short hand for battles over race, rights and justice. We brought you tofergusonat the start of the controversy, and followed through. Our correspondent returned days ago to see what changed. I cant take it any more. Reporter for more than 20 years this man has made his living here at the market now he wonders if his store or the city of ferguson can survive. His store has been attacked three times since the death of Michael Brown. They steel everything, computers, surveillance, they broke it. Everything was broke. Police released t
System and they invested additional funds in n. Shore and that of the iron dome system could be well stocked and supplied and continue to provide protection for civilians who are living under the threat of rockets launched by hamas. Youve also seen on the numerous occasions stand with israel as they confront the threat that is posed for by the president and this administration have said is steadfast in their right to defend their territory and to defend their citizens from violent provocative actions by hamas. Youve also seen the United States in a variety of diplomatic forms defend the efforts to isolate and undermined the standing in the community. They did discuss the nuclear issue. I didnt say then on it, so i cant give a minute by minute. What im prepared to do is read up a president obama said and i will let my counterpart in Israeli Government discussed the Prime Ministers position. Julie. I wanted made sure i understand what change this window when the president said this after
Computer. Produced documents related to the limited by criminaln attorneys with lois lerner who is head of the division at the i. R. S. Weve taken the step of making available as fact witnesses, two prosecutors who explained with miss. Lerner. Following theve Supreme Courts decision in the versus the united f. C. C. Meeting, ite of the became clear it would be difficult to bring criminal this area a no criminal investigations were referred to the department of and no by the i. R. S. Investigation was opened by the integrity session as a result of the meeting. It was both asked by the senate fromng and in a letter senator and the white house if submitted mechanism to the white house. Out to miss. Lerner occur. Followup did not these two instances show that integrityin the section were fulfilling their as Law Enforcement officials. Were ensuring that the department remained vigilant in its enforcement of those laws. As weve explained to the committee previously, in 2010, in conjunction w
Threat to our government to study the founding documents and advocate for responsible spending . Out copies of the constitution, discussing pending legislation or even creating legislative scorecards a threat to the administration . Legislation or even creating legislative score cards a threat to this administration . Obviously these activities are viewed as subversive to their agenda. Otherwise, they wouldnt have tried to stop us. In my previous testimony i explained that our application was complete and accurate. We easily qualified for a 501 c 4 status, yet that did not stop the irs from demanding information they were not entitled to. Unconstitutional requests that violated even their own rules. The information they demanded from us had nothing to do with our tax status. Why must the irs know who is coming to our meetings . Why did they need to have copies of every speech ever given and the credentials of those speakers . Why did they need to know who our donors were . Theres clear
Denied, though. In addition, the committees investigation into this matter revealed the irs also sought out liberal groups with these words, progressive or occupy in the names. At an Oversight Committee hearing last year Russell George admitted he actually failed to inform our committee that he was aware of progressive groups receiving similar treat as conservative groups. Ms. Mitchell, you favored us with your testimony this morning. Thanks again for coming. We just found out about you monday afternoon. We didnt have too much time to read about you. I saw your extensive cv which is on line, and its it has you as a partner at the Foley Lardner law firm in washington. Is that right . Correct. And it says you are a member of the firms political law practice. Is that correct . Correct. The firm has a taxation practice thats different from the political law practice. Correct. Youre in the political law practice. If im not mistaken, you have personally served as Legal Counsel to the Nationa