storm. the affirmative task we have now is to actually create a new world order. because the global order is changing again. so biden said new world order, meaning that the international community needs to revamp trade laws to reflect the times. but in far right conspiracy world, out there, new world order is a secret plot where individual nations are absorbed by a single world government. you may remember alex jones tirade as piers morgan last year suggested the government, our government was out to confiscate all our guns. on biden s nod to a new world order he said, vice president joe biden threw caution to the wind friday as he shockingly declared the affirmative task we have now is to actually create a new world order adding yet another admission to an already long list of documented globalist bragging of plans for a centralized one world global government. to jones and his cohorts, any cooperation among governments
do you want to give people those freedoms? are you free free to text? are you free to text while you re driving with your hands off the wheel? that would be nice. are you free not to pay taxes? once you have government, you re talking about imposing a certain set of obligations on people, but that is the essence of society and civilization. no one is totally free. let s go back to this as a tactic, you first. a tactic. is this a desperate last tactic when obama discover that say people aren t afraid of him, they re used to the first african-american president. they realize he s center left, not some hard lefty, he s somewhere on the democratic mainstream. do they have to use this and will it work or is this just a desperate, we can t think of anything else to say? i feel like after this they re left arguing for liberty. we re all for liberty. we are all are, we re for freedom. they can t demonize obama anymore. they tried that for five years. they can t win on the policy
the american people. the united states senate represents states. their vote is just as powerful as chuck schumers or gillibrand s or anyone in connecticut. and no surprise that pat toomey is seen as a possible switch vote that may come over to the pro gun control side because he s got to be re-elected in pennsylvania which goes for presidents routinely. we re going to almost go to two countries. one that is just the wild, wild west. i don t know what principle the republicans are fighting for. the idea that you should be able to arm up with a militant? they are talking about being able to fight the government. do they honestly think that the founders of this country want to create a country in which they can take down the government that they are fighting? they want to fight the government to keep their guns.
do because it s the party of limited government. it s the party of get government out of our life and it s also, in this case, the party of hypocrisy. because they seem to be that s what you would say if you re a democrat. yeah. go ahead. does your party have a problem the hill has plenty of gay staffers, gay republicans. there are a lot of gay republicans around. how do they stand in this position? the active people? i think the most interesting thing that s happened when rob portman made his decision to come out in favor of gay marriage, all these democrats immediately said, i m with rob portman. what do you think that was about? they were worried about their constituencies back home. i think for rob portman he s the leader? i think he in many ways changed a lot of minds for the democrats. it s been fascinating. there are three democrats. do you have to be a does your kid have to be gay for you to come out for gay marriage if you re republican? apparently.
do the general libertarian argument. any time the government does something, it s infringing on your freedom, therefore, it must be stopped. you re absolutely right. krugman makes the point when ronald reagan was talking about welfare queens, people would point to some other and saying they re the ones soaking up welfare benefits. now you ve had this great recession where lots of middle class people from all walks of life have experienced what it means to suddenly drop out of the middle class. to have to need social services. you ve got a lot of people taking care of their parents, finding out medicare is not a bad thing to have around and they like it because they re taking care of the elderly in their own families so it doesn t work to argue against the programs themselves. this generalized freedom argument is what they re falling back on. you know what, it s fair to ask freedom to do what or freedom from what. in a lot of cases they re talking about freedom to buy a gun if you ve