recognizance, whether it is mapping. and so we followed our policy and took those down. but now we re looking at it specifically. but the office has already analyzed over 300 of these over the last couple of decades. so we are tracking it and seeing who does them. we need to know what our adversaries are capable of. so this is what we have to do to maintain our national security and have an understanding of what our adversaries are doing on an intelligence basis. from your work on the senate intelligence report on ufos, are you satisfied we re closing the
crist s office, asking what were you doing with a mask on, alone in the gym, you freak. they didn t respond. new classified report on ufos or ufps, leaked a lot of encounters in the past year. what is this? feels like it s moving toward something. we can only guess. we have new details on it next.
with some of the best and brightest minds and then take that information and see, you know, does this have applications for national security or air safety, especially as we get ready to launch more and more into outer space okay. so then what? they look at this data. are they first trying to i m trying to make sense of this. are they trying to confirm that, you know, ufos actually do exist? you know what or they re already there? they believe they do exist? there are many who believe they exist. nasa has made a point to say there is no evidence that unidentified aerial phenomena are any contact from extraterrestrials. this is mainly to say again, we want to see, is this let s ensure our military safety, is this spycraft or something else going on that we need to be clear of? remember a couple weeks ago we were celebrating world space week and space and sustainability. there s lots of space debris so
how does nasa go about collecting this data and then what application does it have? what can be done with it? sure. now, to be clear, this is unclassified data, so this will be data that has been garnered from civil agencies, from the public, and there was a report that came out back in 2021 from the office of director of national intelligence stating they didn t have enough information on at least 143 of 144 accounts of uaps that had come in since 2004. what they re going to to do, remember, data is the language of science, it doesn t sound very exciting, but it helps make the unexplainable explainable. nasa will take that data, it will look at it. are these natural occurring phenomena? if they are not do they have techno signatures, biosignatures? they re looking to make a very concise, clear, data collection
figuring some of that out is how do we start mitigating that space debris, what are these things? can we get a clearer picture? unfortunately that is the thing of science, amara, is that it is like, it is slow and methodical and it s like collecting this data, having the best 16 eyes they have artificial intelligence practitioners taking part in this. there will be algorithms and data that hopefully will paint a better picture of what has been seen and they re really, i think it s a statement, they re taking very seriously these reports and unclassified reports of things that really, truly can t be explained. it s one of those things in the last few years that is sort of unsettling. we focus so much on everything that s been going on here on earth, and the pentagon just kind of puts out these videos and like yeah, we don t know what these are. it might be extraterrestrial