capable of killing because there hasn t been any substantiation that the prior incidents would have lead to the death of the individuals. that s one of the biggest issue. he knew these dog s who attack people and let them roam free on the streets jie. there is a difference attacking and killing. that s why this statute attacking and killing. do i think he should be charged? yes. murder 2? no, instant voluntary manslaughter, absolute limit when you have reckless behavior that leads to the death of a human being, and that s why these dog bite cases, if they do overcharge, the jury has to decide. can t be murder 2. he s a dog. the question is whether they re charged appropriately. the standard is what you should have known, and if you know your dog will attack and bite people it s not unreasonable that someone could die attacking and killing. that s why if you re going to charge one with murder 2 they have to know the dogs were capable of killing and there s