14% and took heavy fire about that during the 2012 campaign. as maddow prepared to go on the air last night, the white house acknowledged the document s veracity and writing in statement this. that being said, mr. trump paid $38 million even after taking into account large scale of depreciation for construction of an income more than $150 million as well as paying tens of millions of dollars in other taxes such as sales and excise taxes and employment taxes and this illegally published return proves just that. despite the substantial income figure and tax paid, it is totally illegal to steal and publish tax returns. the dishonest media can continue to make this a part of their agenda, while the president will
false information to get you out of this jam. they have to work this out. these are battles that go on behind the scenes at white house whatever the administration. but i think today being the first full day at the white house to see what we have seen unfolding is just astonishing. i have never seen anything like it. i think you re right. there s a doth protest too much to this. panel is back. mark, we didn t talk about this yesterday. and i said this on the air last night. we wanted to give donald trump his due, it was an inauguration. we didn t focus on the inaugurations. we have been to them, and yesterday they were sparse crowds. we can look at the footage, and that was live. it s on tape now. it is what it is.
to have to come a moment for spicer to say mr. president, i can ant just lie to everyone and present false information to get you out of this jam. they have to work that out. these are battles that go on behind the scenes at white house whatever the administration. but today as first full day for the white house to have this unfold is astonishing, never seen anything like it. i think you re right. there s a doth protest too much to this. panel is back. mark, we didn t talk about this yesterday. said this on the air last night wanted to give donald trump his due. he s president. we didn t focus on the inaugurations. we ve been it to them and yesterday were sparse crowds.
sickening acts that happen. that s some of what transpired on the air last night. people were angry on social media saying how could you not say this is wrong. perhaps we should i should be looking at it. to use the term hate crime, if this was for skinheads doing this to an african-american teenager who had a disability, wouldn t it it be fair to call it a hate crime? i think yesterday, today it is absolutely a hate crime. yed on air when it all broke, we didn t have all the details. but you see it now as a hate crime? i definitely do. i have seen all the details, but regardless, if i think it s a hate crime or not, i think we re having the wrong conversation, if you will. i think the conversation needs to be about what was that young man feeling that was being assaulted? how did we get here as a community where these kids think it s okay to go out and do this? why are we so polarized. i think that s a separate
they found all the reasonable cause they needed to find. i think it is dangerous for folks that aren t legal experts like myself to have this really in depth conversation about the legalities of something. i think it waters it down and takes away from the disgusting, the sickening acts of what happened and i think that s what transpired on the air last night. people were angry on social media saying how could you not say this is wrong? so perhaps we should, i should be looking at it more so to use the term hate crime. if this was for skin heads doing this to an african-american teenage we are a disability, wouldn t it be fair to call it a hate crime? i think yesterday, today it is a hate crime. yesterday on air when it all brokering with didn t have all the details. we were speculating. you see it as a hate crime. do i. i ve seen all the details. regardless, if i think it is a hate crime or not.