the national archives has been trying to get donald trump to return documents since the end of his presidency. i m john berman. brianna is off. cnn chief white house correspondent kaitlan collins is with us this morning. this timeline we just keep getting more data points. it s like every day you learn that the conversations on getting these documents back goes back further than we thought. it was a problem it seems from the beginning. an email from the national archives indicates that records were not returned by trump despite a determination by a top white house lawyer that they should be. a source says there were about a dozen emails and calls over the course of 2021, this is last year, including a may 2021 email from the archives to trump s lawyers that reads in part, quote, it is also our understanding that roughly two dozen boxes of original presidential records were kept in the residence of the white house over the course of president trump s last year in office an
despite a determination by pat cipollone, that s the white house counsel, in the final days of the administration that they need to be. the washington post first reported on this email. also this morning the justice department has about five hours left before a deadline to turn over a redacted version of the affidavit, that s what was behind the fbi s search of mar-a-lago. a judge will then decide whether or not to release that version that is given to him by the justice department or keep it entirely shielded from public view. we re going to get to all of these new data points, all this new information in just a moment. first, though, we want to check in on public opinion. what is the current view among the public of what has been going on the last couple of weeks since the fbi executed that search warrant? with me now a man who can answer that question. i d like to think. cnn s senior data reporter harry enten. there are some polling there are some polls out now that do s
a trial court judge, the job of a trial court judge, is to apply the law to specific facts and to deal with individual cases. and so, mr. chauvin, as to count one, based on the verdict of the jury finding you guilty of intentional second-degree murder while committing a felony, it is the judgment of the court that you now stand convicted of that offense. pursuant to minnesota statute section 60904 counts two and three will remain unadjudicated as they are lesser offenses of count one. sentence for count one, the court commits you to the custody of the commissioner of corrections for a period of 270 months, that s 2-7-0. that is a ten year addition to the presumptive sentence of 150
ad ourned. . , ,, adjourned. there we have derek chauvin former adjourned. there we have derek chauvin former police adjourned. there we have derek chauvin former police officer- chauvin former police officer sentence to 22 years and six months for the second degree murder of an unarmed black man, george floyd. the judge they re saying that he had a 22 page document that would explain all of the reasonings behind his decision but he didn t want to attempt to say anything as he said clever today because he wants it all written down. and he said the reasoning behind his decision, he said it wasn t a sentence based on public opinion, it wasn t based on any attempt to send any message but it was him applying the law to specific facts. let s speak to professor david scholz who teaches criminal law in minnesota. professor, what do you make of the sentence? it’s professor, what do you make of the sentence? , . ., , professor, what do you make of the sentence? 3 . ., , , professor, wha
sympathies. and i acknowledge and hear the sympathies. and i acknowledge and hear the pain that you are feeling. i acknowledge the pain not only of those i acknowledge the pain not only of those in i acknowledge the pain not only of those in the courtroom but the floyd family those in the courtroom but the floyd family who those in the courtroom but the floyd family who are outside this courtroom and other members of the community courtroom and other members of the community. it has been painful throughout the county and the state of minnesota and even the country. but most of minnesota and even the country. but most importantly we need to recognise but most importantly we need to recognise the pain of the floyd family recognise the pain of the floyd family. i m not going to attempt to be profound or clever because it s not the be profound or clever because it s not the appropriate time. i m not basing not the appropriate time. i m not basing my not the appropriat