recurrent investigation. i don t know the details of that. it would probably be done by his old agency. don t you have to give some additional double secret security clearance to serve in the white house? well, yes, you do. as i indicated before could i and you the process, i don t know how it is double in this administration. okay. but my own knowledge of how it was done, when i served in the bush administration and again in the obama administration, there was an extensive vetting process by the fbi. let me stop you because i only have 15 seconds. miss yates, are there any reasonable arguments that can be made in defense of president trump s executive order? i don t believe that there are reasonable legal arguments that are ground in the truth that can be made in defense of his argument that the travel ban
over my time as dni, the answer would be both. just to make a point here. my focus was on foreign target and the foreign target s behavior in relation to the u.s. person. okay. how many instances were there, or was it just one? i can only recall one. could you it could have been more. and the best accounting of this would be in accordance with the procedure, the collecting agency. that would be a better source of records off the top of my head. could you provide us more details in a classified setting? i could. okay. miss yates, the same question. you said, i don t know what you said to answer my question about, if you were involved in any unmasking, were you involved? no.