Come out with a decision in the middle of the night saying, we don t believe in row, we won t abide by it and we are overturning it. but that would take courage and candor, and that is something that this majority lacks. so instead, the court waits 24 hours after the law has already taken effect and then issues this one paragraph order, saying, essentially, nothing. oh, these brilliant texas conservatives have trick the supreme court and there is nothing we can do about it. that is so obviously ally and i think it s an insult to the american people. yeah, and there definitely a few more cases that are making their way to the courts that are going to be closely watched. daniel, quick question. democrats, they ve provides many solutions to this problem, some expanding the court, for example. others said ad term limits so these appointments are not for life. where do you see these proposals going, can they come fast enough, are they likely to die? you know, what i love? i d love for t
The supreme court, joined back to all of the presidents. even president roosevelt wanted to back the court. why? because he felt the judges were to republican. he was like, i want judges that are more democratic. i want more of. them this is how the court has been forever, they always say are not partisan but for the most, part we see that there is a lot to the accusation there, as far as the media goes, we are judging the record. we read the decision. we network what they say both have promised that they would judge everything individually and not and then we watched them walk back from their conclusions all the. time yeah, i was going to say, glittery formally present trump that he wanted pro-life judges on the bench. i mean, he is saying the quiet part out loud. so when you then say these judges, are they partisan or not, it just, you know, kind of scratches ones head. mark, i know that your report on the court has polarization and politicization got worse in the last few year
i absolutely think it has gotten worse. and a big part of that is that the court has lurched far to the right. we now have a six three conservative super majority that has been willing not only to drag the law to the right, but to do so in very alarming underhanded, and anti-transparent ways. the conservative majority s abuse of these shadow dockets to overhaul the law in a direction that the republican party prefers, has been raising alarm bells all across the legal profession for years. finally, i think regular people are starting to see what is happening here. but when the supreme court can overturn roe v. wade, effectively, in the middle of the night in a one paragraph order, with virtually no reasoning, we know there is a problem and it s not the media. doing our best to figure out what this opaque cryptic single paragraph, ending a woman s right to choose could possibly mean. so, i think that amy coney barrett and clarence thomas
Those are the words of dr. alan brady, a texas-based physician yesterday. he became the first doctor to publicly reveal he performed an abortion in defiance of the states law. the so-called heartbeat act, which went into effect earlier this month, effectively bans all abortions after six weeks. next month, the supreme court will take up a challenge to a mississippi abortion law. that case will give the court the opportunity to reverse roe v. wade, and activists have been sounding alarm bells about the future the long health president since justice amy coney barrett was appointed to the court, in 2020. now, this past week, justice barrett caused a stir when she said the court was, quote, not compromised of a bunch of partisan hacks. and that the media, along with hot takes on, twitter report the results and decisions. that makes the decision seem
Battles at times that are less partisan from the big party appointing justices and there are moments where it is more partisan, in terms of that. basically, you have a back and forth in the court for generations. and you know, we are living through a time now where a lot of these decisions are very big and momentous and, you know, in particular with regards to the texas abortion law. you know, the law of the land for the last, you know, 50 years or so, almost 50 years, has been roe v. wade and we are going to see a real test to that, you know, not just what we saw in the last couple weeks, but over the coming months. mark, let s elaborate about what you said on the end of roe v. wade. because after the supreme court refused to block that texas abortion ban, you are the piece titled of course this supreme court ended roe v. wade by doing nothing. explain what makes this supreme court so different from others, and what it means for the future of roe v. wade? so, the hallmark of the