so there s a very suggestive timeline on the events leading up to the release of john podesta s hacked e-mails. august 21st, 2016, roger stone tweeted, trust me, it will soon be podesta s time in the barrel. #crookedhillary. which got a lot of people s attention at the time. how can stone possibly know that, what did he mean? october 5th, stone s now-identified back channel to wikileaks, randy credico, posted this selfie. after meeting with julian assange in the ecuadoran embassy in london. one day later, after that, on october 6th, roger stone tweeted, julian assange will deliver a devastating expose on hillary at a time of his choosing, i stand by my prediction, #handcuffsforhillary. cute. one day after that, the single
timeline on the events leading up to the release of john podesta s hacked e-mails. august 21st, 2016, roger stone tweeted, trust me, it will soon be podesta s time in the barrel. #crookedhillary. which got a lot of people s attention at the time. how can stone possibly know that, what did he mean? october 5th, stone s now-identified back channel to wikileaks, randy credico, posted this selfie. after meeting with julian assange in the ecuadoran embassy in london. one day later, after that, on october 6th, roger stone tweeted, julian assange will deliver a devastating expose on hillary at a time of his choosing, i stand by my prediction, #handcuffsforhillary. cute. one day after that, the single most consequential day of the entire 2016 campaign. the access hollywood tape came out. it s a tape of donald trump bragging about sexual assault, threatening to sink trump s already faltering campaign.
conversations of conversations okay, i i m going to the foreign legislation act, you re familiar with it? right. you think it s good policy? good law, has value have any other trump campaign advisers or senior administration officials lobbied for foreign governments without disclosing it under the foreign agent registration act? i m not able to comment on that. why not? repeat the question. perhaps i misunderstood it. in addition to paul manafort and michael flynn, have any trump campaign advisers or senior administration officials lobbied for foreign governments without disclosing it under the foreign registration act? that would be a matter that should be directed to mr. mueller i believe. moving to a new question, on october 6th, the department of justice actually you on behalf of the department of justice issued a 25-page memo to all federal agencies purported to provide guidance on religious liberty protections under
close. this election, again, was forecasted to be really close. people weren t used to that. i think a lot of people who had been following polls, who didn t have a lot of experience in the area had a sort of naive view because the last few elections, the polls happened to be pretty close with the national election but let me give you a quote. my colleagues wrote this in the new york times on october 6th. this november, we would not at all be surprised to see mrs. clinton or mr. trump beat the state by state polling averages by about 2 percentage points. we just don t know which one would do it. and that was based on historical analysis. they get it wrong sometimes. from the same summation of your work, i too want to quote, i want to put it up on the screen because i thought this was remarkable. we examine, this is part of your research, 4,221 late campaign polls, every public poll we
were predicted by the polls. part of it is that people kind of forgot that the 2012 election was so close that actually obama only got 52% of the vote. we think about president obama, mitt romney as a failure, he lost the election, but it was really close. this election again was forecast to be really close. people weren t used to that. i think a lot of people who had been following polls, who didn t have a lot of experience in the area, had sort of naive view because the last few elections the polls happen to have been very close at the national election. but let me give you a quote. my colleagues wrote this the new york times on october 6th. this november we would not at all be surprised to see mrs. clinton or mr. trump beat the state by state polling averages by about two percentage points. we just don t know which one would do it and that was based upon our historical analysis. they get it wrong sometimes.