i ve always said i m not opposed to unemployment insurance. i m opposed to having it without paying for it. we have never offset emergency spending. this foolishness, we have people who are desperate. they ve been out of work for some, as much as two years. on january 15th, a major deadline to fund the government. a deal was reached last year but it needs to be finalized. as early as february, a deadline to raise the debt ceiling again with both sides already dug in. i think that it will be harmful not just for the economy but i think harmful politically if republicans use 2014 as the year to threaten, default again on the debt limit. and an even heavier lift for a deal on immigration reform. which has escaped congress for years. it can t be my way or the highway on such a big issue. not to mention, continued attempts by republicans to change obama care.
talk to people all over the country and talk to business leaders and talk to real people in washington about what he thinks the priorities should be. i think he s working very hard to make sure we don t go off the cliff. i think people should not think that it s a good idea to go off the cliff, because on january 1st, on january 15th, regular americans who live paycheck to paycheck are going to see a tax increase, and i think tom cole is exactly right let s deal with the tax rates for people who make below $250,000. there s a bill in the house they could pass tomorrow that the senate already passed. take that issue off the table so working americans know their paycheck is going to be the same on january 15th as it was on december 15th. david, it does seem like a last-minute messaging change because we did hear for a long time that if we go off the fiscal cliff, it is, indeed, a cliff and that the implications could be catastrophic if not on january 1st or january 10th, it s a bad t
no, he is absolutely fored woman. author of the book by ton have them. leaderless jihad, mark is a he enters the united states leading forensic sigh cia through chicago in june 5th operative trick and counter of 1990. on june 6th he goes out to terrorism expert. and then they blame the west the social security administration and applies for because that is what puts the a social security number. he lies about his place of temptation there. on january 15th, 2000, two birth. paul speary is the author of saudi arabiaians 24-year-old infiltration and muslim mafia. he says he is worn in yemen almadar and ah-hazmi arrive in instead of las cruces, new southern, california. mexico. and provides the yemeni phillip was the executive passport as proof of who he is director of the 9/11 and his identity. commission. the social security why would khalid shaikh administration issues a social security number to him on june 8th of 1990. muhammad sent two hijackers who now, joining
look about it or think about a woman. author of the book leaderless jihad, mark is a leading forensic sigh cia operative trick and counter terrorism expert. and then they blame the west because that is what puts the temptation there. on january 15th, 2000, two saudi arabiaians 24-year-old almadar and ah-hazmi arrive in southern, california. phillip was the executive director of the 9/11 commission. why would khalid shaikh muhammad sent two hijackers who speak no english to southern california unless there is someone there to help them. this got our attention, too. we notice that the two men kind of get their footing and then very quickly, though, they make a bunch of calls including, by the way, to awlaki. they are getting help
these labs and the covering it all up. that s why we need answers and a credible investigation, not another whitewash by the world health organization. kayleigh: dr. marc siegel, starting first with you, on january 15th, before the end of the trump administration, the state department under mike pompeo put out a report and said that this investigation had come up with three conclusions that there were scientists who were sick at the wuhan institute of virology. number two, they determined that there was a gain of function research being conducted, and finally they concluded that this institute had actually engaged in military operations or research to some effect, but this was not completed yet, and we have a response here from current state department spokesperson i think we will put up on the screen if you have a moment. he says this. that reporting is incorrect that we ended investigation. in february and march of 2021,