so with that in mind, it s the worth remembering that one hundred years ago, memphis a boom was one of the richest, best organized cities in the country. it ha hadd a booming economy. it had beautiful municipalhan parks, a lot of them more than a hundred. it had one of the most modern te sanitation systems in worle take something w for granted now. but when yellow fever was real, no one took it for granted. memphis was such a bigwas th deal that in fact, was the mis the informal capital of an entire american region. the mississippi deltanot an,t not anymore. in fact, by last year, i f b you went to memphis, it was hard to believe that any of that had ever been true at any point. because by that point and nowa memphis had become a husk and a highly threatening one in 2020si one , according to federal, statistics, memphis, tennessee, was the most dangerous city in the united states . talast year.w much it recorded a total of three hundred and forty two murders. no?w, how
the problem with california is there s zero diversity at all in politics. one party runs.cs it has and o for decades. they ve run it completely into the ground. so larry elder, who has been ing the media in california for decades, decided he was goinge e to run because he could dodia a better job. but the media indecide californm immediately decided, larry elder, if he s going toocpart challenge the democratic partyyh ,must be a white supremacist, despite the fact he doesn t look like your classic w whitete supremacist. oft that s what they always do. divimedia follows the direction of the democratic party and divides people along racials lines for political benefit, even when in the case of larry a elder, it makes no sense atlarr all. they do it anyway, and it sder a maill kind of works. so larry elder has had a lot of time to think about this. and he made a movie on it slook called uncle tom , tooin.s have and it looks into why leftistss have adopted the strategy of dividing us a
all right. great to see you tonight. congrats on the movie. tuk you . appreciate it. so charles haywood had a longd e and very successful business career and he kind retired thinn and started reading a lot and then writing reviews ofply the books for amazonanis. g bo and then he started thinkingn en more deeply.ti and then he turned his hobby, reviewing books intorepolitica e political philosophy, which we found really interesting. it sd foundational ism and isre focused on moving politics to a future past, huh? it was interesting. so we spoke to charles haywooden at great length about it for m hour because we wanted to learn more . we thought you would want to. as well. here s part of the conversatione . so foundational ism is what i like to call the politics of future past, which is the subhead of the of the website. and by that i mean that foundational ism isn t meant to be an ideology as i am. i m not coming up.- i well, i m not karl marx that i have discovered new loss of