which loses millions of decent-paying jobs. i also very strongly disagreed with deregulation on wall street. i opposed that. when you allow the greed and recklessness on wall street to go unchecked you are going to end up where we are today and eight years ago. when you watch your chief primary opponent right now, secretary hillary clinton on some key issues she has changed her position to a more progressive view. on same-sex marriage immigration, this is over the last ten years. nafta on trade, on the iraq war, on cuba. she has moved from a position basically in disagreement with you to a position that comes closer to your view. my guess is do you take her at her word and do you think rhetorically that s enough? i have known hillary clinton for 25 years. i have enormous respect for her
disastrous trade agreements which loses millions of decent-paying jobs. i also very strongly disagreed with deregulation on wall street. i opposed that. when you allow the greed and recklessness on wall street to go unchecked you are going to end up where we are today and eight years ago. when you watch your chief primary opponent right now, secretary hillary clinton on some key issues she has changed her position to a more progressive view. on same-sex marriage immigration, this is over the last ten years. nafta on trade, on the iraq war, on cuba. she has moved from a position basically in disagreement with you to a position that comes closer to your view. my guess is do you take her at her word and do you think rhetorically that s enough?
with deregulation on wall street. i opposed that. i think the results prove when you allow the greedregular less recklessness of wall street to go unchecked, you are going to end up where we are today and eight years ago. when you watch your chief primary opponent right now, secretary hillary clinton on some key issues, she has changed her position to a more progressive view. on same-sex marriage, immigration, this is over the last ten years. nafta, on trade, on the iraq war, on cuba. she has moved from a position basically in disagreement with you to a position that comes closer to your view. my guess is, do you take her at her word and do you think rhetorically that s enough? i have known hillary clinton for 25 years. i have enormous respect for her and i like her. what i hope is that the media will allow us to have a serious debate in this campaign on the enormous issues facing the
list of state sponsors of terrorism. cuba wants to be off of that list. and they ve almost basically stated that that is a prerequisite of opening the embassies in washington and havana. that did come up during the conversation between president obama and raul castro. one thing we should point out, during i guess a briefing that was given by reporters to the administration official it was indicated to reporters that the president is nearing a decision on this issue and so some of the interagency reviews that have taken place after the state department recommendation that has apparently come to an end and the president is close to a decision. both men in this meeting, poppy, also talked about reopening these embassies. they both essentially pledged that they would like to do that as quickly as possible. but they have to work through a lot of these thorny issues. one issue the president raised is he ll insist u.s. diplomats have free rein when they re in cuba which is if you re not aware
evolution regardless of what we do inside of cuba. partly it s going to be generational. you know, if you listen to president castro s comments earlier this morning, a lot of the points he made referenced actions that took place before i was born. and you know, part of my message here is the cold war is over. there s still a whole lot of challenges that we face and a lot of issues around the world, and we re still going to have serious issues with cuba on not just the cuban government s approach to its own people but also regional issues and concerns. there are going to be areas where we cooperate, as well. you know, cuban doctors deployed