branches. should supreme court justices be held to the same standard as any and all other public servants? the senate judiciary committee held a hearing on the ethical standards or lack thereof for supreme court justices a topic that has come up in light of new reporting on repeated failures by justices to disclose details of lavish vacations, travel, gifts, even real estate transactions, testifying on behalf of democrats, a former federal judge and group of legal experts, guests invited by republicans included a former attorney general. more notable than who testified was who did not. chief justice john roberts declined an invitation from the committee, something dick durbin brought up at the start of today s hearing. in his letter last week the chief justice sent a statement of ethics principles and practices. it was a document that was attacheded to his letter. it is an extraordinary document. not in a good way. it makes clear while the justices are fine with consulting
messages, the house select committee investigating the capitol insurrection wants by tomorrow. plus, after a wild week on wall street, earning are rolling in and this morning from some of the world s biggest companies such as goldman sachs and bank of america. cnbc s andrew ross sorkin is breaking down the latest number as we get them in. and we ll explain why democrats are very upset with joe manchin. it is groundhog day. it is getting old. and we ll play for you president biden s response to reporters when asked about his fist bump when saudi arabia s crown prince. we ll also talk about the actual visit to saudi arabia. but first, the damning new report about the police response to one of the deadliest school shootings. systemic failure is the way it was described in a new preliminary report written by the texas house of representatives, the report also details how nearly 400 law enforcement officials responded to the mass shooting and basically waited outside as the
shable interest of what tucker could have said is the content of his on air platform. everything has been the great replacement theory, citing in the manifestos of mass shooters, views about ukraine we learned in new reporting, rupert murdoch was on the phone with ukrainian officials making clear he didn t agree with, views about the military, the military leaders would tell you were bad for military readiness. i mean the content was so reprehensible what do you think is in a text message that s worse? i mean this is why i ve said, considering all that we do know, i m really curious to find out all that we don t know and how damaging it is not just for fox news as a business entity, but for our democracy, because it s clear that tucker carlson and others used the platform to undermine our democracy. dominion s attorney made a point that stuck with me, what was their contemporaneous response? were they inclined to do the right thing, say the right
but that not going to meet bannon s needs. he needs to come out on the courthouse steps and pontificate and we re watching whether he s trying to insight violence. what does it mean to go medieval. this is good. and whether we ll see a gag order perhaps because he typically going from court to his on air platform and starts ranting and raving. so, yes, short and quick. but he ll drag it out with all kinds of motions and screaming and we ll see it could go weeks potentially. oh, wow. okay. and the january 6 select committee has also subpoenaed the secret service for these allegedly deleted text messages. the committee expects to get them tomorrow after it made that request following a briefing by the department of homeland security s inspector general. that watch dog said last week that the secret service claimed texts in january 5th and 6th had