well, go ahead. wait, don t on my joe.y joe, what do you think? what do you think of this,his? greg? i don t have a robot. and i eliminated the need for another human being. years ago. that s what happens in jail. yeah, i stepped on it. yes, yes. but by the way i mean let s point something out here, brooke. you get a . where do you keep it? i mean, like somebody is going to stumble on to it. it i like somebody walking in on your collection when you had one or if well, when i walked in on my husbandi wa with his robot, i was relieveds . i just thought, you know, this is so sad because, you knoweadig when we were reading the articles about how people were textings abou, much that they couldn t talk to each other anymore, and then people started using dating apps and then they didn t know how to go on a date anymord then and, you know, where is this
thank you. thank. all right. chicago is now so dangerous, they may legally be required to change their name to alec baldwi r change n. i want hits. asarting in september, judges will use a risk assessment system to determine whether or no t someone should be released. in other words, no matte r how heinous the crime, they ll be totally set free. criminal justice advocates celebrating it, claiming it will reduce the number of people held in jail before trial simply because they can t afford bail. yes, because that s the only reason why they re in jail and nothing to do with the crimes they committeing tod andr again and will continue to do over and over again. agaillbut they re poor. the fact is, by eliminating bail, you actually eliminate jail. jails will be so empty. you could rent them out for bar mitzvahs and kids parties. brooke? yes, that wasn t a slight atd
right. it was designed d to deceive people. it would be like going, hey, sign this. don t get cancer. sure, i ll sign it. and then they give you cancer. it s like this is like if e the acronym shouldacrony have said let people out om f jail, not the safety act. s oo evenut of they know fos to pass, they had to lie to people and. they did it. pas what say you libertarian? i would sas,theyy. that risk assessment is objectively a better standard thassment in amount ofm when determining whether or not someone should staouwhen dety jr not, especially because you ve just been accused of a crime. if you re in jail,l, you have been convicted of one. now, i m going to give everybody a minute to thro crimt me if they want to, but i will explain and say what i. the problem with that is i do not trust this government actually stick to that standard. they re probably going to make truse decision s for political reasons, just like how in chicago they have all these gun laws that they don t c
your people. but you are the attorney here. so let s take another stab at your expertise. let s. what say you about this? how is this possible here? another class action suit.he you could shoot like here. here s the setup. a recidivist criminal commits assault against me. ifwould have been in jail he couldn t pay it bail, but couldn t. why can t i sue? you can y can t e?t. there s no citizen general standing, and you can t go afteritizen g the police for. for failure to act. but as a civil rights attorney, i have to say that there was an issue here. we had an issue where the cost of bail would disproportionately affect minorities and marginalized communities. and it s just not fair to people go into jail for the same crime. commone can afford to bail and e can t. however, you don t solve the problem by eliminating bail altogethercannot., because whato you do? you create new problems