the curriculum committee. i felt this was there were some good things happening for kids. i also did not support a petition when the board voted on february 8 because of the deficiencies in the budget. i still continue to see that they want the best for kids. i have got an e-mail from families that believe this is a good program for kids. i was trying to think, i don t remember and the time that i have been on the board that i have seen the staff recommended denying a renewal before this one. it has happened since you have been on the board? [talking over each other] a renewal petition does seem to have a different standard from the staff. it does make me think very seriously when i have recommendation for the nile. denial. i m just sort of talking out loud, i think. i am troubled by some of the budget deficiencies that have identified. i know that we are all facing an absolute terrible budget outlook. this is a very tough one for me. president mendoza: before we continue
this is the second immediate tim e we ve reviewed their budget. he has certainly been the case that if there was a deficiency identified, where one thing was corrected, it went back and forth. because the petitions are supposed to be complete perfected a, when they come to us, we have not had the back and forth to do that. if we had unlimited time and staff to do that. so the only chance was when a clarification can on the actual verses rounding it out. if i am looking at something like this and looking at an average, it takes away those kind of things. it is not the maximum amount for every individual person. they take into account how many people use their wives health insurance and independent, so what and so forth. this is based on how many people are to the health insurance and how many people are not. these are the kinds of thing is where if the assumption is not put forward in a clear way, we re going to have some issues about that. that is what we tried to move o
again, this is just a suggestion. so does everybody understand what the option is in order to give the board members of little bit more time to have a discussion around the budget peace? he would have a regular budget meeting on the twenty eighth, we would have a special meeting right after to discuss this one item. it would be brought on may 3 half of the committee as a whole meeting for final vote? is there a question about what the proposed timeline is? this is provided that the state would be willing to put this on their agenda and willing to address in it if need be. just a point of clarification. what is supposed to take place and before that? take place before that? they can come and answer the questions that have been stated here? that is the purpose that comes to the budget meeting for the presentation. is it to clarify those things? did you have any opportunity to have dialogue with edison? as you were making recommendations, it did not sound like that hap
not with edison, certainly. this is the second immediate tim e we ve reviewed their budget. he has certainly been the case that if there was a deficiency identified, where one thing was corrected, it went back and forth. because the petitions are supposed to be complete perfected a, when they come to us, we have not had the back and forth to do that. if we had unlimited time and staff to do that. so the only chance was when a clarification can on the actual verses rounding it out. if i am looking at something like this and looking at an average, it takes away those kind of things. it is not the maximum amount for every individual person. they take into account how many people use their wives health insurance and independent, so what and so forth. this is based on how many people are to the health insurance and how many people are not. these are the kinds of thing is where if the assumption is not put forward in a clear way, we re going to have some issues about that. t
recommendations, it did not sound like that happened. not with edison, certainly. this is the second immediate tim e we ve reviewed their budget. he has certainly been the case that if there was a deficiency identified, where one thing was corrected, it went back and forth. because the petitions are supposed to be complete perfected a, when they come to us, we have not had the back and forth to do that. if we had unlimited time and staff to do that. so the only chance was when a clarification can on the actual verses rounding it out. if i am looking at something like this and looking at an average, it takes away those kind of things. it is not the maximum amount for every individual person. they take into account how many people use their wives health insurance and independent, so what and so forth. this is based on how many people are to the health insurance and how many people are not. these are the kinds of thing is where if the assumption is not put forward in a cl