sanction but maybe their businesses are not because of fears about the consequences of damaging the businesses, implement and all the rest. if businesses, implement and all the rest. , ., businesses, implement and all the rest. i., businesses, implement and all the rest. y., ., businesses, implement and all the rest. ., ., ., . , rest. if you look at the oligarchs who were rest. if you look at the oligarchs who were sanctioned, rest. if you look at the oligarchs who were sanctioned, it s - rest. if you look at the oligarchs - who were sanctioned, it s remarkable that some have been targeted as some have escaped. russia s richest man you would think might be on the list that he might be somehow closely, but he has not been sanctioned that s because he owns or has a big chunk of a big nickel producer. likewise the us and the uk and the eu sanctioned alisher usmanov who used to own part of arsenal and now part of everton and they sanctioned to him and blocked his yacht and various thi
Недовольство местными выборами: партии олигархов и нарушения закона
azattyk.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from azattyk.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
protect the 2020 election from the same kind of russian attack we had in 2016, those bills do have bipartisan support. they do have bipartisan sponsors. but they, too, are being blocked by one man in washington, one republican, senator mitch m mcconnell who will not let any of those bills come up for a vote though they have bipartisan support. also, frankly, those sanctions against russia for what they did in the election, there was a lot of republican support. in response to that attack. once again, it s been one man in washington who has blocked some of those efforts. or, shall we say, reasons of his own. when russia attacked us, it wasn t just russian military intelligence. it was also their spy service. it was also kremlin-connected oligarchs who seemed to have been kind of deputized by the kremlin to run different parts of that complex operation. it was, for example, kremlin-connected oligarchs who ran who were running
go to prague. s you re referring to the very big allegation in the dossier that michael cohen would have been a link to collude. this allegation is interesting because while it doesn t confirm or deny that it would track with high level ongoing contact with oligarchs who, don t take my word for it, don t take your word for it, take the trump s administration. the allegation is and i want to ask you how someone might come to know something like this. from october 2016 until january 2018, until this year, mr. cohen used his bank account here for over $4 million in transactions including half a million traced to mr. victor, oligarch and that
rick gates both of whom were indicted in robert mueller s russia probe. a number of others here, too. this will raise several questions. first of all, the original list back in january that the treasury department was required to come up with by law, more than 200 people, officials, oligarchs who could be subject to sanctions. today they re targeting 38. it would be 24 individuals. it s a fair question why so late, why so few of those original 200 names. although the time has passed, would these people have time to move around their investments and help protect them from those sanctions? thirdly, in all this talk,
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.