potential good argument actually think mark meadows has a potential good argument there - actually think mark meadows has a potential good argument there onl actually think mark meadows has a i potential good argument there on the sunremacy potential good argument there on the sunremacy clause potential good argument there on the supremacy clause of potential good argument there on the supremacy clause of the supremacy clause of the constitution. supremacy clause of the constitution. he - supremacy clause of the constitution. he was - supremacy clause of the i constitution. he was acting supremacy clause of the - constitution. he was acting as an officer constitution. he was acting as an officer of constitution. he was acting as an officer of the constitution. he was acting as an officer of the united constitution. he was acting as an officer of the united states, - constitution. he was acting as an officer of the united states, thel officer of the united states, the f
constitution and - that his fealty was to the constitution and i- that his fealty was to the constitution and i shouldj that his fealty was to the i constitution and i should be that his fealty was to the - constitution and i should be about the constitution constitution and i should be about the constitution and constitution and i should be about the constitution and not constitution and i should be about the constitution and not any i constitution and i should be about the constitution and not any one l the constitution and not any one mart the constitution and not any one mart i the constitution and not any one mart i think the constitution and not any one man. i think what the constitution and not any one man. i think what the the constitution and not any one man. i think what the former - man. i think what the former president man. i think what the former president did man. i think what the former president did was man. i think what the former - president did wa
make on that? i think that donald trump was to get i make on that? i think that| donald trump was to get a make on that? i think that - donald trump was to get a fair trial in donald trump was to get a fair trial in a donald trump was to get a fair trial in a jury donald trump was to get a fair trial in a jury that donald trump was to get a fair trial in a jury that is trial in a jury that is consisted trial in a jury that is consisted entirely. trial in a jury that isi consisted entirely of trial in a jury that is - consisted entirely of people wearing consisted entirely of people wearing red consisted entirely of people wearing red hats consisted entirely of people wearing red hats that - consisted entirely of people wearing red hats that seem| consisted entirely of people - wearing red hats that seem make america wearing red hats that seem make america great wearing red hats that seem make america great again. wearing red hats that seem make america great again.
the world has ever knownhe for reasons that escape astound and dismay me.ns the modern democratic party wants to throw it under the bus. they want to throw itit underh the bus with statements like that he s making. they want tot throw it under the bus by intimidating, denigrating and demeaningsu a supreme court ofpr the unitedb states and ultimately by packing the court so they canyy turn it into a political football. and the thing is, without the supreme court being an independent arbiter of what the law is, there is no i constitution. they want to pack it soo it can destroy the court and in so doing destroy the constitution. that s why i wrote saving nine . saving nine tells the story of t the last time this happenedim in the fact that we re still paying the price for it. when you look at for example, just abolishing the electoral college or packing the courtssor or statehood for d.c. or getting rid of the filibuster, all these items the democrats have bought up brought up y and your
0 authoritarian state. that is the destruction of democracy. and we can t let them do it. we re doing our part. thank you for joining us for this hour. have the best evening b with the ones you love.see you we ll see you tomorrow. and welcome to hannity. and we start with the fox news alert breaking tonight . we have all three major broadcast networks, fake news, cnn, msnbc, all happily broadcasting well, the dullest the most boringel. there s absolutely nothingng nothing new . multi hour democratic fundraiser masquerading as a january six hearing. going to and by the sounds of it, they re going to do hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours of t us produced by a former abc executive, 100% hollywood production with all the creative licensesere that wd go along with that. butt make no mistake, tonight s so-called hearing is not in good faith. it is not an honest probe into the security breakdown on that fateful day and we will prove that to tonight instead it is i a made for tv smear