Release , live at our expense with you, the current legislation of ukraine provides the opportunity for judges who are involved in criminal cases not to be disgracefully dismissed. How this is still possible, we will tell you today, and first of all, before the news, the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutors Office referred the case against the judge of the koretsky District Court to the court in april of this year, yevhen kulyk of the rivne region was exposed by a judge. For demanding 1,100 in bribes, according to investigation materials, kulyk promised to close an administrative case against a citizen who drove a car while under the influence of alcohol. The judge received the money through the suspects lawyer. The National Anticorruption bureau of ukraine and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutors Office stole the head of the state judicial administration, oleksiy salnikov, on inciting bribery of judges of the supreme court, according to the officials investigation on march 5th
A mafia criminal case, and thats why when these businessmen, on their own initiative, because they caught a god or something else, start threatening the free press, the government is threatens, and russia actually, maybe just understanding that there are certain journalists in society who are important for people, who are the voice of truth for people, simply. Because of their agency, or because of threats of such and such strange inadequacies, here he threatens himself, and the Russian Agency , for example, thinks to himself oh, this is interesting, this can now be stirred up and directed against the authorities, against kyiv, for example, there and washington and the whole world, we, we understand that the authorities must protect journalists the way they protect themselves, because these are both reputational losses and losses of trust, and threat of these or other disturbances, rebellions, misunderstandings with society, what the enemy can take advantage of, instead we see neglect,
Larisa, you have a word. I think so, and we are talking about, here we must still distinguish between priests, the congregation and the leadership of the church, because we see that a huge number of priests, they basically have a proukrainian position, they serve, they have there is a mission, recently our colleague with you, dmytro krapivka, described a very interesting, interesting case when he. Entered a church somewhere in the east, where he is currently fighting, and the priest there strengthened him with water, he said well, the moscow patriarchate says go and beat the adversary, crossed and sent, that is, there is, well, we say that there are congregations, there are priests and that is one thing, but if we talk about the structure, then it still has coordination with the Russian Orthodox church, we see that in the holy synod before. Recently there were traitors, there were people who are in the occupied crimea are already clearly representatives of the Russian Orthodox church,
Because of these telegram blunders, they came to yuri nikolovs door, knocked, shouted that he was a dodger, well, that is , there were very, very many different events that testify to the fact that what is happening to the weaver is obvious, it is obviously being shaped by the current team, attitude towards journalists, thats why there are these cases in the state, as the weaver recalls 12 criminal proceedings, well, this is too much for one magazine. Why do you think zelenskyis team, which is currently focused on western aid, why does it not take into account that for our western partners this indicator of freedom of speech, attitude towards journalists, the civilized world looks at it in a completely different way, that is, such things are all unacceptable and are investigated much faster than in our situation. I agree with you, sergey, that the beginning of all this. There is the attitude of the authorities towards journalists, i. E. Misunderstanding of the benefits of a free press,
Of the russian dictator putin is a complete bluff, he said this in bbc interview. Lets hear what lansbergis said. It was always a bluff. He has nothing to gain from this. He has something to lose. You know he has certain countries on his side now. At least he believes he has the support of china and the global south. Countries in africa and latin america, he will lose it in an instant if he really goes for it. And, by the way, not only the lithuanians are talking about this, china is also talking about it, and xi jinping has repeatedly expressed that Nuclear Weapons should not be used in the world, because if there is only one precedent, when the Russian Federation gets a tactical Nuclear Weapons and will try to use them. It against some country, it will mean that pandoras box will simply open, and everyone will understand that Nuclear Disarmament weapons can turn into weapons of attack, and this is dangerous for the whole world, and especially for china, because they understand that i