i think he delivered a very nuanced and very, you know, legalese-heavy argument for his prosecutors in particular.e1 he defended his prosecutors nearly every single question he received. his argument was nuanced. it was measured. he took nearly an hour of questions. it got to the point where every third question was asking him why he was not apologizing to victims. toátrráh(oint across.i] he came armed with testimony from his prosecutors that detailed how hard it was to get victims to stay the course back he acts like this is in the 1950s, but it was only 12 years ago. but whatever the case, he said it was a different time. on the other hand, he took an hour away from the president.i] for better or worse, er(resident who programs his presidency.e1 he has gotten a lot of news coverage. +yçó he reached the level where it was time for him to speak out. and now it s sort of whether or1