It was it is was created by the National Stark act of 1966. And its recently a couple years ago celebrated. Its 50th anniversary. It is a Regulatory Agency and as we will see has responsibilities not only in that area but also to advise the president in congress on matters concerning preservation policy. The regulatory section is called section 106 and that is a requirement that all federal agencies have to request the to take into account the impact of their projects of their undertakings and thats broadly construed permit of funding actual license a connection nexus in any way that they have to take that into account if theyre going to have a an effect on a Historic Property or a potential Historic Property defined as a property on our eligible for the National Register. And then they have to request a comments of the Advisory Council give the council a reasonable opportunity to comment and thats the regulatory section in their regs that implement that statutory requirement. Can the
We are going to talk about Historic Preservation. I want to introduce you to jordan tannenbaum. He is the vice chair of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, what is that organization . The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is an independent federal agency, part of the executive branch. It is created by the national Historic Preservation act of 1966, and recently a couple of years ago its elevated its 50th anniversary. It is a regulatory agency, and, as we will say, has responsibilities not only in that area but also to advise the president and congress on members concerning preservation policy. The regulatory section is called section 106, that is a requirement that all federal agencies have to take into account the impacts of their projects. Of their undertakings, and that is broadly a permit of funding. License, connection nexus in any way that they have to take into account if they are going to have an effect on a Historic Property, or a potential Historic Property
Theres no magical number. Boise has done wonderful things with their investments. Look around San Diego State, cincinnati, connecticut. You look, you put cases part of it is our geography. And our success. We were successful. Cincinnati as an example, they have an operating debt in the tens of millions of dollars. They are paying money every year , in some form or fashion, someone is paying interest on that debt. That was a decision made by the university to make the investment, going back to the question of what you were asking. They have done things to facilities. You look at the 12 since the television contract. These are schools that were established schools. You look at what has gone on andin the facilities boom the page of football coaches particularly in the conference. It has been a huge increase. They didnt have to ante up to get in. They were already there. You have to youre still playing the game. Is amazing. , it wellee this, you know this at Arizona State in terms of withi
Corruption and the babylonians and the greeks had arguments about the use of it in some forms. I think this will continue to be a policy tension that we have to navigate. You will have love to talk about getting some better hackers. I think we have questions from the audience. If anyone has anything. [inaudible] david from politico. Can you elaborate a little bit more on white house observation of what was going on at the jp morgan and the other Financial Institutions and in what context . Was at standalone briefings or briefings in the context of just randomly suggested something russia sanctions . So, the way to think about this, part of our job on the National Security council is to make sure the president and his advisers remain informed about the wide array of National Security threats that come from the country. So that is the context we were treating this particular issue. Sure it is part of an ongoing Law Enforcement investigation with the fbi and secret service so there is a l
Are responsible for, you know, getting tough on crime and throwing the book at people and implementing the policies that we enshrine into law. But i will ask you both, youre both members of the bar. Youre both attorneys. Youre licensed to practice law. And you know that when a person suffers a a felony conviction even misdemeanor convictions in many states, they are barred from being able to be licensed to practice law. Do you believe that those types of barriers which are collateral consequences, you believe that those should be removed from persons ability to practice law, to get a law license . Mr. Heck . Well, i think like in any other collateral sanction, i think they have to be looked at, the offense and the offender. And i think there are cases. Weve seen it in ohio, where those impediments have been removed. And someone who is convicted, say, for example of Involuntary Manslaughter or murder have become lawyers. Weve seen it with a lot lesser offenses. And yet at the same time