from each other. they can t even see each other s reaction while they re testing, but all of these tests are only for oil compounds. turns out, no one is testing these fish for possible contamination by that controversial dispersant correctsent. i believe called one of the particularly toxic chemicals. there s no chemical test that s begun right now? there s not a chemical test for that right now. reporter: what? no test? so how can they guarantee safety be complete? we decided to dig deeper to clarify. noaa says an abundance of caution they re currently developing a chemical test for dispersants, it just isn t ready yet and can t come soon enough for the millions of people who want to eat these fish and those who make a living catching them. based on everything you know now, how long is it going to stay closed? it s going to stay closed until the well, the oil leak, is stopped. once the oil leak is stopped,
of your testing, so here it is. tastes pretty good as well. i m not an expert. that seems pretty good to me. the researchers say a contaminated fish has a distinct taste. it s unmistakablunmistakable. if all of this sounds subjective to you, you re right. that s why there are ten different testers, all of them hidden from each other. they can t even see each other s reaction while they re testing. but all of these tests are only for oil compounds. turns out, no one is testing these fish for possible contamination by that controversial dispersant corrects it. one of the particularly toxic chemicals, you can t there s no chemical test that s being done right now. there s not a chemical test for that right now. reporter: what? no test. so how can the guarantee of safety be complete? they dig deeper to clarify. noaa says out of an abundance of caution they are currently
even if it was contaminated, even a small one like this would not be problematic. eat this, they don t swallow it, they say, pause they don t want to ruin the rest of the testing. so here goes. tastes pretty good as well. not an expert, that seems pretty good to me. the researchers say a contaminated fish has a distinct taste. it s unmistakable. but if all of this sounds subjective to you, you re right. that s why there are ten different testers, all of them, hidden from each other. they can t see each other s reaction while they re testing. but all these tests are only for oil compounds. turns out, no one is testing these fish for possible contamination by the controversial dispersant. you can t believe one of the toxic chemicals in the
you think is contaminated. the sense of smell. the sense of taste. even if it was contaminated, even a small one like this would not be problematic. eat this, they don t swallow it, they say, pause they don t want to ruin the rest of the testing. so here goes. tastes pretty good as well. not an expert, that seems pretty good to me. the researchers say a contaminated fish has a distinct taste. it s unmistakable. but if all of this sounds subjective to you, you re right. that s why there are ten different testers, all of them, hidden from each other. they can t see each other s reaction while they re testing. but all these tests are only for oil compounds. turns out, no one is testing these fish for possible contamination by the controversial dispersant.
hidden from each other. they can t see each other s reaction while they re testing. but all these tests are only for oil compounds. turns out, no one is testing these fish for possible contamination by the controversial dispersant. you can t believe one of the toxic chemicals in the dispersant there s no chemical test being done right now. there s not a chemical test for that right now. what? no test? so how can the guarantee of safety be complete? we decided to dig deeper to clarify noaa says in an abundance of caution, they re developing a test. it can t come soon enough for those who want to eat these fish and those who make a living catching them. based on what you know now, how long will it stay closed.