hearing on tuesday. as trump s former white house counsel, cipollone was in the room for many of the key events during trump s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. cipollone s name has come up extensively throughout the six hearings the committee has already held. but it was after we heard from former white house aide cassidy hutchinson late last month that the pressure really ramped up on cipollone to testify, under oath, before the committee. i saw mr. cipollone right before i walked out onto west exec saturday morning and mr. cipollone said something to the effect of, please make sure we don t go up to the capitol, calf city. keep in touch with me. we are going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen. there are developments today of potential new testimony the committee may hear from two other individuals who were closely aligned with trump. here s the headline for my paper, the washington post. trump considers wavin
extensively throughout the six hearings the committee has already held. but it was after we heard from former white house aide cassidy hutchinson late last month that the pressure really ramped up on cipollone to testify, under oath, before the committee. i saw mr. cipollone right before i walked out onto west exec saturday morning and mr. cipollone said something to the effect of, please make sure we don t go up to the capitol, cassidy. keep in touch with me. we are going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen. there are developments today of potential new testimony the committee may hear from two other individuals who were closely aligned with trump. here s the headline for my paper, the washington post. trump considers waving claim to executive privilege for steve bannon. my colleagues isaac stanley-becker, josh joce and jacqueline alameda report, quote, former president donald trump is considering sending a letter to stephen k. bann
when i read the draft, the alito draft, i immediately wrote a column saying, yo, obergefell is in danger. just a logic you take away row in the right to privacy, where does that leave obergefell? but i ll pick up on something you just said. that justice thomas is inviting litigation. but do you also buy the contention that he is also sending a signal to those conservative judges in lower courts, many of whom clerked either for him or justices on the supreme court that, hey, i am inviting litigation. and then that litigation gets to you, y all know what to do. that s exactly right. and so again, for those who would say he is a voice crying out in the wilderness, that may have been true about ten years ago. but people need to update their [inaudible] under the [inaudible] presidency, the lower courts were filled with tourists who, as you say, were if not former
unenumerated whites will not be protected unless they are deeply rooted in this nation s history and tradition. last time i checked, the right to same sex marriage, the right to contraception, the right to same sex sexual intimacy none of these we deeply enshrined in the nation s history and tradition. so, it s just a cue e.d., it s a matter of logic, that underneath that task, these precedents are virtually imperiled. whenever i raise this, jonathan, i get accused of fearmongering from reporters whenever i say, oh obergefell is next, lawrence is next, people say, oh, justice thomas is a crank he s an outlier, he doesn t know what he is saying. i would say a couple of things that. he knows exactly what he is saying. he came to our country and what has [inaudible] done in previous cases, the second amendment, inviting litigation where he wants litigation to occur. so, to dismiss him as an outlier is definitely false. and if you say, in the days since dobbs, we have seen
protected unless they are deeply worded in the face of the three traditional out of time attack the right things the test that samuel alito are articulated for the majority in jobs, with the that right about unenumerated whites will not be the protected unless they are right to deeply rooted in this nation s take that look into history and tradition. that do last time i checked, the not have right to same sex marriage, the sportingly the right to contraception, the right to same sex sexual shrine in intimacy the nation s history in front of those just like you need is just about a lot of that none of these were deeply fell underneath enshrined in the nation s that path history and tradition. is providence are broadly arrow now whenever i write so, it s just a q.e. d., this it s a matter of logic, that job and underneath that task, these i don t think precedents are virtually you have imperiled. fearmongering whenever i raise this, and betty ford jonathan, i get accused of or whatever