15 weeks no elective abortions, whereas a state like new york or new jersey coulde take a different path. it would also mean, shawn, we re not among the good company. as justice roberts said during oral arguments of the people s republic of china in north korea because right now that is exactly where the united states stands with our abortion laws. we know 60 million children, 62 million have perishedly because of this law. o state that s nearlys one fifth of the united states population. and you re exactly right tos note that from the beginning sean roe was wronglywr decided.a even laurence tribe, a liberal jurist, said that this is a verbal smokescreen. that s what he called roe, the substantive judgment of which was nowhere to be found.ht ruth baderer ginsburg, she thought that it was better left althou states. she was a critic ofgh roe, thouh she was a proponent of abortion rights generally, she thoughtth the democratic process was the way at least she made one or two comments inti
and i think there is a greatn chance you might be right on the money on this. we don t want harvey. i let my judgments interfere with how i predict the outcomean or analyze a case i won roe versus wade to be upheld. but i am yellow and wender understand you are very r clear your parents were losinge your picture. professor. thank you . thank you , greg.ank you. here on the phone now here on the latest breaking news about roe v. wade isakroe senator josh hawley. senator , i m i want to go back to this one more timear and what they re saying in this political articles that theio supreme court hasn voted to overturn abortion rights according to a draft opinion, . roe was egregiously wrong from the start. its reasoning was exceptionally weak. its decision has had damaging consequences. and far from bringing about an a national settlement on the abortion issue, roe and casey have inflamed debate,i and deepened division.
the inescapable, inescapable conclusion is the right to an abortion is not deeply rooted in the nation s history or tradition.s the constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion, the draft concludes.rt in other words, abortion willl not be made not illegal by the federal government.st it willates be up to to the stao decidee.. d roe and casey abrogated that authority. we now overrule these a decisior and return our authority to the people and their elected representatives of a lot more inpresav this breaking news straight ahead tonight .tonigh but this is this is pretty interesting just to be very clear here, evenen though this s a draft, sounds like the likelihood that s where their their decision is headed toward. so we ll watch this very closely. also tonight , coming up,htin a bombshell new development from the durham probe. we also have disturbingo have dt new video showing alleged antifa rioting attackingnt republicans in portla
these drafts go back and forth. they can change votes can change until it actually is signed off by the nine justices or whoever if there are people recuse all of the justices hearing the case until it s signedere off and it s issued fm the court s office officially as an opinion of the court has. it s not the real deal . so this is a draft if it is legit, as i ve been led to believe it is from february, which means a lot off things could have changed.d there are there could be justices who would read this and say, wow, this is sweeping . i m not prepared to sign up to something this sweeping or you could have five justices who ve already saids this is something i will sign onto. and basically what it does if u this ends up being the opinion in some form or fashion, if it w uses this wording, it s essentially sending the idea of abortion back to the states and saying they will decide at the people there decide itss upholds the mississippi law and says roe and casey got it completely wr
there wasem an attempt at one point when he decided to go with the liberal wing, with the among the conservatives to bring him back in to their side. they had this meeting.g. ca back together to get together and when he showed up and they realized he was noti with them, they thought there s t nothing else we can do. we ve lost him at this point. f, so there a wasnd some backpe and forth and that clearly could have happened in this believe ce this februaryince dr. and like i said, i ve been led to believe that this was legitimate as a february draft . a lot could have happened between now and then. i have never as you said, seen a leak like this at the court in the years that i ve covered it. itvet. is astonishing that somey would release a draft opinionon outsidee the court. ifey are very tightly held. there are almost never any leaks from this one place in washington. every place else leaks like a sieve l around here, not s the court. and this is shocking actually .f you know and let