judge ketanji brown jackson disagreeing with the president that he says he has complete immunity from having either himself or any of his officials testify before congress. judge brown riding this court holds that executive branch officials are not absolutely immune from compulsory congressional process. no matter how many times the executive branch has inserted as much over the years. even if the president expressly directs such officials noncompliance. white house officials told me yesterday that know-how, no way is mcgahn ever going to testify before congress. dana, you will probably reminder that in the harriet myers case, the president refused to comply. she was charged with corruption she was charged rather with contempt of congress. that was a civil case that dragged on through the courts until january of 2009 when the 110th congress disbanded and therefore the contempt of congress citation became moot and the whole thing went away.
actually like people to testify. it is a democrat scam that is going nowhere. but future presidents should in no way be compromised. what has happened to me should never happen to another president. jackson a district court judge who ruled that mcgahn has to testify disagreed with the president in his ruling saying, in part, quote: this court holds that executive branch officials are not absolutely immune from compulsory congressional process no matter how many times the executive branch has asserted as much over the years, even if the president expressly directs such officials noncompliance. the white house officials tell me no how, no way are they going to allow mcgahn to testify. ultimately, the case against harriet miers was dropped because when the clock turned over to 2009, the 110th congress was disbanded and the contempt citation went away with all of that. and no question about this, trace. this is not going to happen tomorrow. this is going to take a while to go through the